Marcus Gil, Levy Samuel, Salhab Ghaleb, Mengesha Bethlehem, Tzuman Oran, Shur Shira, Burke Erica, Mayeda Rebecca Cruz, Cochavi Lior, Perluk Idan, Zaidenstein Ronit, Lazarovitch Tsilia, Dadon Mor, Marchaim Dror
Department of Cardiology.
Unit of Infectious Diseases.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 20;3(4):ofw232. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw232. eCollection 2016 Oct.
Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) constitute a common reason for hospitalization. However, there is lack of standardization in empiric management of (1) anaerobes, (2) enterococci, (3) fungi, and (4) multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). The recommendation is to institute empiric coverage for some of these organisms in "high-risk community-acquired" or in "healthcare-associated" infections (HCAI), but exact definitions are not provided.
Epidemiological study of IAI was conducted at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (May-November 2013). Logistic and Cox regressions were used to analyze predictors and outcomes of IAI, respectively. The performances of established HCAI definitions to predict MDRO-IAI upon admission were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
After reviewing 8219 discharge notes, 253 consecutive patients were enrolled (43 [17%] children). There were 116 patients with appendicitis, 93 biliary infections, and 17 with diverticulitis. Cultures were obtained from 88 patients (35%), and 44 of them (50%) yielded a microbiologically confirmed IAI: 9% fungal, 11% enterococcal, 25% anaerobic, and 34% MDRO. Eighty percent of MDRO-IAIs were present upon admission, but the area under the ROC curve of predicting MDRO-IAI upon admission by the commonly used HCAI definitions were low (0.73 and 0.69). Independent predictors for MDRO-IAI were advanced age and active malignancy.
Multidrug-resistant organism-IAIs are common, and empiric broad-spectrum coverage is important among elderly patients with active malignancy, even if the infection onset was outside the hospital setting, regardless of current HCAI definitions. Outcomes analyses suggest that empiric regimens should routinely contain antianaerobes (except for biliary IAI); however, empiric antienterococcal or antifungals regimens are seldom needed.
腹腔内感染(IAI)是住院的常见原因。然而,在(1)厌氧菌、(2)肠球菌、(3)真菌和(4)多重耐药菌(MDRO)的经验性治疗方面缺乏标准化。建议在“高危社区获得性”或“医疗保健相关”感染(HCAI)中对其中一些病原体进行经验性覆盖,但未提供确切定义。
于2013年5月至11月在阿萨夫·哈罗费医疗中心对IAI进行了流行病学研究。分别使用逻辑回归和Cox回归分析IAI的预测因素和结局。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析计算既定HCAI定义在入院时预测MDRO-IAI的性能。
在审查了8219份出院记录后,连续纳入了253例患者(43例[17%]为儿童)。其中116例为阑尾炎患者,93例为胆道感染患者,17例为憩室炎患者。88例患者(35%)进行了培养,其中44例(50%)培养结果为微生物学确诊的IAI:真菌占9%,肠球菌占11%,厌氧菌占25%,MDRO占34%。80%的MDRO-IAI在入院时即已存在,但常用的HCAI定义在入院时预测MDRO-IAI的ROC曲线下面积较低(分别为0.73和0.69)。MDRO-IAI的独立预测因素为高龄和活动性恶性肿瘤。
多重耐药菌引起的IAI很常见,对于有活动性恶性肿瘤的老年患者,即使感染发生在医院外,无论目前的HCAI定义如何,经验性的广谱覆盖都很重要。结局分析表明,经验性治疗方案应常规包含抗厌氧菌药物(胆道IAI除外);然而,很少需要经验性的抗肠球菌或抗真菌治疗方案。