Hartman S E
Department of Anatomical Sciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Oct;80(2):145-66. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800203.
Because teeth are commonly preserved in the fossil record, dental remains have often been employed in estimating evolutionary relationships among fossil hominoids. This is appropriate, however, only to the extent that dental morphology is phylogenetically informative. I have used phenetic analytic techniques to assess whether hominoid molars are likely to be useful for phylogenetic inference. Thirty-four occlusal landmarks for first and second molars were chosen; seven on each maxillary and ten on each mandibular tooth. Three-dimensional locations of these points were determined from stereophotographs of dental arcades of more than 260 specimens from six taxa (gorilla, chimpanzee, human, orangutan, siamang, and gibbon). Analytic emphasis was on canonical variates analyses of landmark coordinates for mandibular and maxillary second molars, adjusted for intergroup size differences. There is little correspondence between the systematic implications of hominoid molar morphometrics and reliable estimates of evolutionary propinquity based on interhominoid biomolecular similarities. The former seem to have been determined largely by dietary constraints. Although this suggests the possibility of using the protocol employed here to infer diets of fossil hominoids, molar crown measurements seem unlikely to serve well as phylogenetic indicators in the Hominoidea.
由于牙齿在化石记录中通常得以保存,牙齿遗迹常被用于估计化石类人猿之间的进化关系。然而,只有在牙齿形态具有系统发育信息的程度上,这种做法才是合适的。我运用了表型分析技术来评估类人猿臼齿是否可能对系统发育推断有用。为第一和第二臼齿选择了34个咬合地标;上颌每颗牙7个,下颌每颗牙10个。这些点的三维位置是根据来自六个分类单元(大猩猩、黑猩猩、人类、猩猩、合趾猿和长臂猿)超过260个标本的牙弓立体照片确定的。分析重点是对下颌和上颌第二臼齿地标坐标进行典型变量分析,并对组间大小差异进行调整。类人猿臼齿形态测量学的系统学含义与基于类人猿间生物分子相似性的可靠进化亲缘关系估计之间几乎没有对应关系。前者似乎在很大程度上由饮食限制所决定。尽管这表明有可能利用这里采用的方法来推断化石类人猿的饮食,但臼齿冠测量似乎不太可能很好地作为类人猿超科的系统发育指标。