Taylor H R, Munoz B, Keyvan-Larijani E, Greene B M
International Center for Epidemiologic and Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989 Oct;41(4):467-71. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1989.41.467.
To quantify the sensitivity of skin snips for the diagnosis of onchocerciasis, data collected over a 2 year period from 261 Liberians, 12-60 years of age, were examined. The overall sensitivity of 6 snips per person was estimated to be 91.6%. When the microfilariae density was greater than or equal to 3.5 microfilariae/mg skin, there were no false negatives. At lower microfilaria densities, the sensitivity declined markedly. Furthermore, it was found that smaller and lighter snips were more likely to be classified as being falsely negative. The load of infection at the community level may be reduced after intervention strategies, such as vector control or community-based chemotherapy. Interpretation of the impact of these programs on the prevalence of infection should take into account the lower sensitivity of the skin snips at lower levels of infection.
为了量化皮肤切片诊断盘尾丝虫病的敏感性,对在两年期间收集的261名年龄在12至60岁的利比里亚人的数据进行了检查。每人6片皮肤切片的总体敏感性估计为91.6%。当微丝蚴密度大于或等于3.5条微丝蚴/毫克皮肤时,没有假阴性。在较低的微丝蚴密度下,敏感性显著下降。此外,发现更小、更轻的皮肤切片更有可能被归类为假阴性。在采取病媒控制或社区化疗等干预策略后,社区层面的感染负担可能会降低。在解释这些项目对感染率的影响时,应考虑到在较低感染水平下皮肤切片的敏感性较低。