• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导管定向溶栓和药物机械性血栓切除术可改善急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的中期预后。

Catheter-directed thrombolysis and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy improve midterm outcome in acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

作者信息

Kuo Tzu-Ting, Huang Chun-Yang, Hsu Chiao-Po, Lee Chiu-Yang

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Far East Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;80(2):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcma.2016.08.012
PMID:28025027
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aggressive and early thrombus removal strategy has been widely used as a treatment for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We compared the long-tem venous outcome, including postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), in patients undergoing catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT).

METHODS

From January 2009 to December 2013, 61 patients with acute proximal DVT were enrolled in this prospective study. Thirty-one patients underwent CDT and 30 patients underwent PMT, and each patient was followed for at least 2 years after treatment. Observations included venous outflow resistance, venous insufficiency, thrombus score (TS), severity of PTS, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Venous outflow obstruction was similar in the CDT and PMT groups (32.3% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.695), and venous insufficiency of each group was 38.7% and 30.0% (p = 0.774), respectively. The TS at 24 months of each group showed no significant difference (0.90 vs. 0.70, p = 0.526). The mean Villalta scale scores of the CDT and PMT groups were 3.13 and 1.87, respectively (p = 0.042). Patients without PTS had significantly lower TS since 1 week postoperatively (1.59 vs. 4.60, p < 0.001). The severity of PTS was highly correlated with the TS, rate of thrombolysis, and severity of obstruction, and was moderately correlated with the venous registry index and reflux severity.

CONCLUSION

CDT and PMT have similar venous outcomes in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT, although PTS is less severe following PMT than after CDT. We propose that early and thorough removal of thrombus, using either CDT or PMT, is beneficial to prevent PTS.

摘要

背景

积极的早期血栓清除策略已被广泛用于治疗髂股深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。我们比较了接受导管定向溶栓(CDT)和药物机械性血栓切除术(PMT)的患者的长期静脉结局,包括血栓形成后综合征(PTS)。

方法

2009年1月至2013年12月,61例急性近端DVT患者纳入本前瞻性研究。31例患者接受CDT,30例患者接受PMT,每位患者在治疗后至少随访2年。观察指标包括静脉流出阻力、静脉功能不全、血栓评分(TS)、PTS严重程度和手术并发症。

结果

CDT组和PMT组的静脉流出道梗阻情况相似(32.3%对30.0%,p = 0.695),每组的静脉功能不全发生率分别为38.7%和30.0%(p = 0.774)。每组24个月时的TS无显著差异(0.90对0.70,p = 0.526)。CDT组和PMT组的平均Villalta量表评分分别为3.13和1.87(p = 0.042)。术后1周起,无PTS的患者TS显著更低(1.59对4.60,p < 0.001)。PTS的严重程度与TS、溶栓率和梗阻严重程度高度相关,与静脉登记指数和反流严重程度中度相关。

结论

CDT和PMT在急性髂股DVT患者中的静脉结局相似,尽管PMT后的PTS比CDT后轻。我们建议,使用CDT或PMT早期彻底清除血栓有利于预防PTS。

相似文献

1
Catheter-directed thrombolysis and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy improve midterm outcome in acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管定向溶栓和药物机械性血栓切除术可改善急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的中期预后。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;80(2):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
Managing iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis of pregnancy with a strategy of thrombus removal is safe and avoids post-thrombotic morbidity.采用血栓清除策略治疗妊娠髂股深静脉血栓是安全的,可以避免血栓后发病。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):456-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.108. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
3
Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy offers lower risk of post-thrombotic syndrome than catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.对于下肢急性深静脉血栓形成患者,经皮药物机械性血栓切除术比导管定向溶栓术发生血栓形成后综合征的风险更低。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.药物机械血栓切除术与导管直接溶栓治疗髂股静脉深静脉血栓形成:临床试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029618821190. doi: 10.1177/1076029618821190.
5
[Endovascular treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis - our results with catheter-directed thrombolysis and AngioJet].[急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的血管内治疗——我们采用导管直接溶栓和AngioJet的治疗结果]
Magy Seb. 2017 Mar;70(1):24-31. doi: 10.1556/1046.70.2017.1.4.
6
Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.导管直接溶栓与药物机械性血栓切除术治疗有症状的下肢深静脉血栓形成
Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.045.
7
Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life.比较药物机械性导管溶栓与导管溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成:长期临床结局和生活质量的衡量标准。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
8
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis.在深静脉血栓形成中,进行监测凝血功能、剂量调整的导管直接溶栓或药物机械血栓清除。
Vasa. 2023 Nov;52(6):416-422. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001097. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?在治疗深静脉血栓方面,哪一种方法最好——经皮机械血栓切除术、导管定向溶栓还是联合应用?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 5;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02908-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?在治疗深静脉血栓方面,哪一种方法最好——经皮机械血栓切除术、导管定向溶栓还是联合应用?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 5;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02908-3.
2
Clinical characteristics of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in young vs. middle-aged adults: a single-center retrospective study.青年与中年成人下肢深静脉血栓形成的临床特征:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 26;11:1381391. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1381391. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.
导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute and Subacute Blocked Arteries and Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Health Technology Assessment.下肢急性和亚急性阻塞动脉和静脉的机械血栓切除术:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):1-244. eCollection 2023.
5
Percutaneous endovenous intervention versus anticoagulation in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮腔内静脉介入治疗与抗凝治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1018. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4334.
6
A rare coexistence of acute thrombotic occlusion of the left popliteal-tibioperoneal artery and the left iliofemoral vein: a case report.左腘-胫腓动脉急性血栓形成闭塞与左髂股静脉罕见并存:病例报告
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2022 Mar 28;7:e1-e4. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2022.114939. eCollection 2022.
7
An In vitro System to Gauge the Thrombolytic Efficacy of Histotripsy and a Lytic Drug.一种用于评估超声空化溶栓和溶酶药物溶栓效果的体外系统。
J Vis Exp. 2021 Jun 4(172). doi: 10.3791/62133.
8
AngioJet Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.经导管溶栓与 AngioJet 血栓切除术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的比较:临床试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211005548. doi: 10.1177/10760296211005548.
9
Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.下肢急性深静脉血栓形成的溶栓策略与标准抗凝治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;1(1):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub5.
10
Catheter-directed therapies for pulmonary embolism: considerations for patients with patent foramen ovale.经导管治疗肺栓塞:卵圆孔未闭患者的相关考虑。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Feb;51(2):516-521. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02189-2.