• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在深静脉血栓形成中,进行监测凝血功能、剂量调整的导管直接溶栓或药物机械血栓清除。

Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Vasa. 2023 Nov;52(6):416-422. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001097. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a001097
PMID:37847240
Abstract

Pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are therapeutic options for selected patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 159 patients with symptomatic iliofemoral DVT undergoing PMT alone, CDT alone, or CDT followed by PMT (bail-out) in the Swiss Venous Stent Registry. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-interventional major and minor bleeding complications (ISTH criteria). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PTS and stent patency after 3 years. Mean age was 49±20 years and 58% were women. DVT involved the iliac veins in 99% of patients, whereas 53% had an underlying iliac vein compression. PMT alone was used in 40 patients, CDT alone in 77, and 42 received initial CDT followed by bail-out PMT due to insufficient thrombus clearance. Single-session PMT was the preferred approach in patients with iliac vein compression, patent popliteal vein, and absence of IVC thrombus. Patients treated with PMT alone received a lower r-tPA dose (median 10 mg, IQR 10-10) vs. those treated with CDT (20 mg, IQR 10-30). The rate of peri-interventional major bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 2%, whereas that of minor bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 12%, respectively, all occurring during CDT. After 3 years, PTS occurred in 6%, 9%, and 7% of patients, respectively. The primary stent patency rate was 95%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. The use of PMT and CDT for iliofemoral DVT was overall safe and resulted in high long-term patency and treatment success. Given the less severe presentation of DVT, single-session PMT appeared to be characterized by numerically better primary patency and lower perioperative bleeding event rates than CDT.

摘要

药物机械血栓切除术 (PMT) 和导管定向溶栓术 (CDT) 是治疗选择的一部分,用于预防血栓后综合征 (PTS),以治疗有症状的急性深静脉血栓形成 (DVT) 的患者。我们旨在描述在瑞士静脉支架注册中心,159 例接受单独 PMT、单独 CDT 或 CDT 后行 PMT( bailout)的有症状髂股 DVT 患者的临床特征和结局。主要结局是围介入期主要和次要出血并发症的发生率(ISTH 标准)。次要结局包括 3 年后 PTS 和支架通畅率的发生率。 平均年龄为 49±20 岁,58%为女性。DVT 累及髂静脉 99%的患者,而 53%的患者存在髂静脉受压。40 例患者接受单独 PMT,77 例患者接受单独 CDT,42 例患者因血栓清除不充分而接受初始 CDT 后 bailout PMT。对于存在髂静脉受压、隐股静脉通畅和 IVC 血栓的患者,单次 PMT 是首选方法。单独接受 PMT 的患者接受的 r-tPA 剂量较低(中位数 10mg,IQR10-10),而接受 CDT 的患者剂量较高(20mg,IQR10-30)。围介入期大出血的发生率分别为 0%、1%和 2%,小出血的发生率分别为 0%、1%和 12%,均发生在 CDT 期间。3 年后,分别有 6%、9%和 7%的患者发生 PTS。主要支架通畅率分别为 95%、88%和 83%。 髂股 DVT 采用 PMT 和 CDT 治疗总体上是安全的,长期通畅率和治疗成功率较高。鉴于 DVT 的表现相对较轻,单次 PMT 似乎具有更高的原发性通畅率和更低的围手术期出血事件发生率,与 CDT 相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis.在深静脉血栓形成中,进行监测凝血功能、剂量调整的导管直接溶栓或药物机械血栓清除。
Vasa. 2023 Nov;52(6):416-422. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001097. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Effectiveness and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis in conjunction with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: A meta-analysis.经皮机械血栓切除术联合导管溶栓治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Jul;11(4):843-853.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Meta-analysis and systematic review of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.经皮机械血栓切除术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Nov;6(6):788-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.002.
5
AngioJet Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis vs. Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Alone for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.AngioJet 机械血栓切除术与导管溶栓联合治疗与单独导管溶栓治疗髂股静脉血栓形成的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;60(4):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy offers lower risk of post-thrombotic syndrome than catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.对于下肢急性深静脉血栓形成患者,经皮药物机械性血栓切除术比导管定向溶栓术发生血栓形成后综合征的风险更低。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;29(5):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
7
Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?在治疗深静脉血栓方面,哪一种方法最好——经皮机械血栓切除术、导管定向溶栓还是联合应用?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 5;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02908-3.
8
Managing iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis of pregnancy with a strategy of thrombus removal is safe and avoids post-thrombotic morbidity.采用血栓清除策略治疗妊娠髂股深静脉血栓是安全的,可以避免血栓后发病。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):456-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.108. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
9
Catheter-directed thrombolysis and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy improve midterm outcome in acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管定向溶栓和药物机械性血栓切除术可改善急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的中期预后。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;80(2):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy versus thrombolysis in patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内机械血栓切除术与溶栓治疗髂股深静脉血栓形成患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vasa. 2021 Jan;50(1):59-67. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000875. Epub 2020 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute and Chronic Ilio-Femoral Venous Reconstruction.急性和慢性髂股静脉重建术
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):1605-1615. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03786-x. Epub 2024 Jul 11.