Thelen T, Thelen P, Demezon H, Aunoble S, Le Huec J-C
Orthopedic and Spine Surgery Unit 2, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
RIM Maussins-Nollet, 114, Rue Nollet, 75017 Paris, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
Three-dimensional (3D) acetabular orientation is a fundamental topic in orthopedic surgery. Computed tomography (CT) allows 3D measurement of native acetabular orientation, but with a substantial radiation dose. The EOS imaging system was developed to perform this kind of evaluation, but has not been validated in this indication with specific attention to the acetabulum. We therefore performed a prospective study using EOS to assess: (1) the reproducibility of the 3D acetabulum orientation measures; (2) normative asymptomatic acetabular morphology in standing position, according to side and gender; and (3) the relationship between acetabular anteversion and pelvic incidence.
The low-dose EOS imaging system is a reproducible method for measuring 3D acetabular orientation in standing position.
In a previous prospective study of spine sagittal balance, 165 asymptomatic volunteers were examined on whole-body EOS biplanar X-ray; 102 had appropriate images for pelvic and acetabular analysis, with an equal sex-ratio (53 female, 49 male). These EOS images were reviewed using sterEOS 3D software, allowing automatic measurement of acetabular parameters (anteversion and inclination) and pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope) in an anatomical (anterior pelvic plane: APP) and a functional reference plane (patient vertical plane: PVP).
Both intra- and inter-observer analysis showed good agreement (ICC>0.90); Bland-Altman plot distributions were good. Acetabular anatomical anteversion and inclination relative to APP (AAAPP and AIAPP, respectively) were significantly greater in women than in men, with no effect of side (right AAA: women 21.3°±3.4° vs. men 16.1°±3.3° (P<0001); right AIAPP: women 55.3°±3.7° vs. men 52.5°±3.0° (P<0001); left AAAPP: women 20.9°±3.5° vs. men 15.6°±4.0° (P<0001); left AIAPP: women 54.6°±3.5° vs. men 52.7°±2.8° (P=0003)). The same differences between men and women were observed when measurements were related to PVP. Pelvic incidence subgroup (<44°; 44-62°; >62°) correlated significantly with functional acetabular orientation in standing position: PVP functional anteversion decreased by 5° relative to APP anteversion with incidence <44°, was equal to APP with incidence 44-62°, and or was greater by 4° relative to APP with incidence >62°.
The use of a 3D sterEOS software prototype version for 3D reconstruction of the native acetabulum from standard EOS X-ray was shown to be a reliable and reproducible method. This innovative method enabled the reference values of 3D acetabular orientation in standing position to be measured for the first time. The results reinforced the concept of hip-spine relationships, and involved very low radiation dose.
IV prospective study without control group.
三维(3D)髋臼方向是骨科手术中的一个基本课题。计算机断层扫描(CT)可对天然髋臼方向进行三维测量,但辐射剂量较大。EOS成像系统就是为进行此类评估而开发的,但尚未在该适应症中针对髋臼进行具体验证。因此,我们开展了一项前瞻性研究,使用EOS来评估:(1)三维髋臼方向测量的可重复性;(2)根据左右侧和性别,站立位无症状髋臼的正常形态;(3)髋臼前倾角与骨盆倾斜角之间的关系。
低剂量EOS成像系统是一种可重复的测量站立位三维髋臼方向的方法。
在之前一项关于脊柱矢状面平衡的前瞻性研究中,对165名无症状志愿者进行了全身EOS双平面X线检查;其中102人有适合骨盆和髋臼分析的图像,男女比例相等(女性53人,男性49人)。使用sterEOS 3D软件对这些EOS图像进行分析,可在解剖学参考平面(骨盆前平面:APP)和功能参考平面(患者垂直平面:PVP)中自动测量髋臼参数(前倾角和倾斜角)和骨盆参数(骨盆倾斜角、骨盆倾斜度和骶骨坡度)。
观察者内和观察者间分析均显示出良好的一致性(组内相关系数>0.90);Bland-Altman图分布良好。相对于APP的髋臼解剖学前倾角和倾斜角(分别为AAAPP和AIAPP),女性显著大于男性,且不受左右侧影响(右侧AAAPP:女性21.3°±3.4°,男性16.1°±3.3°(P<0.001);右侧AIAPP:女性55.3°±3.7°,男性52.5°±3.0°(P<0.001);左侧AAAPP:女性20.9°±3.5°,男性15.6°±4.0°(P<0.001);左侧AIAPP:女性54.6°±3.5°,男性52.7°±2.8°(P = 0.003))。当测量与PVP相关时,男女之间也观察到了同样的差异。骨盆倾斜角亚组(< 44°;44 - 62°;> 62°)与站立位功能性髋臼方向显著相关:当倾斜角< 44°时,PVP功能性前倾角相对于APP前倾角降低5°,当倾斜角为44 - 62°时,与APP相等,当倾斜角> 62°时,相对于APP增大4°。
使用3D sterEOS软件原型版本从标准EOS X线对天然髋臼进行三维重建,是一种可靠且可重复的方法。这种创新方法首次测量了站立位三维髋臼方向的参考值。结果强化了髋部与脊柱关系的概念,且辐射剂量极低。
无对照组的IV级前瞻性研究。