Poston John W
*Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3133 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3133.
Health Phys. 2017 Feb;112(2):193-198. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000612.
It took about 30 y after Wilhelm Konrad Roentgen's discovery of x rays and Henri Becquerel's discovery of natural radioactivity for scientists in the civilized world to formulate recommendations on exposure to ionizing radiation. We know of these efforts today because the organizations that resulted from the concerns raised in 1928 at the Second International Congress of Radiology still play a role in radiation protection. The organizations are known today as the International Commission on Radiological Protection and, in the United States, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Today, as we have many times in the past, we honor Dr. Lauriston Sale Taylor, the U.S. representative to the 1928 Congress, for his dedication and leadership in the early growth of NCRP. NCRP's mission is "to support radiation protection by providing independent scientific analysis, information, and recommendations that represent the consensus of leading scientists." The developments in science and technology, including radiation protection, are occurring so rapidly that NCRP is challenged to provide its advice and guidance at a faster pace than ever before. NCRP's role has also expanded as the Council considers newer uses and applications of ionizing radiation in research and medicine as well as the response to nuclear or radiological terrorism. In such a technical world, new areas have been established to deal with the nexus of science and regulation, especially in the United States. Lord Ernest Rutherford supposedly said, "That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting." I wonder what he would say if he were alive today as now many embrace a new field called "regulatory science." This term was suggested by Professor Mitsuru Uchiyama in Japan in 1987 and was reviewed in literature published in English in 1996. Some have attributed a similar idea to Dr. Alvin Weinberg, for many years Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He actually introduced the term "trans-science," which he defined as the policy-relevant fields for which scientists have no answers for many of the questions being asked. He was influenced by the heavy involvement of the Laboratory in developing methods to assess environmental impacts as mandated by the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act. Professor Uchiyama defined regulatory science as "the science of optimizing scientific and technological developments according to objectives geared toward human health." In essence, regulatory science is that science generated to answer political questions. This paper will introduce regulatory science and discuss the differences between what some call "academic science" and "regulatory science." In addition, a short discussion is included of how regulatory science has and will impact the practice of radiation protection and all areas involving the use of radiation and radioactivity.
在威廉·康拉德·伦琴发现X射线以及亨利·贝克勒尔发现天然放射性之后,文明世界的科学家们花了大约30年时间才就电离辐射暴露问题制定建议。我们如今了解这些努力,是因为1928年第二届国际放射学大会上所引发关注催生的那些组织,至今仍在辐射防护领域发挥作用。这些组织如今分别是国际放射防护委员会以及在美国的国家辐射防护与测量委员会(NCRP)。今天,就像我们过去多次做的那样,我们向1928年大会的美国代表劳里斯顿·塞勒·泰勒博士致敬,感谢他在NCRP早期发展过程中的奉献和领导。NCRP的使命是“通过提供代表顶尖科学家共识的独立科学分析、信息和建议来支持辐射防护”。科学技术的发展,包括辐射防护领域,日新月异,NCRP面临着前所未有的挑战,需要更快地提供其建议和指导。随着该委员会考虑电离辐射在研究和医学中的新用途和应用,以及应对核或放射性恐怖主义,NCRP的作用也得到了扩展。在这样一个技术化的世界里,尤其是在美国,已经设立了新的领域来处理科学与监管的关联问题。欧内斯特·卢瑟福勋爵据说曾说过:“不可测量的就不是科学。不是物理学的就是集邮。”我不禁想,如果他今天还活着,看到现在很多人欣然接受一个名为“监管科学”的新领域,他会作何感想。这个术语是日本的内山光教授在1987年提出的,并在1996年发表的英文文献中得到了探讨。有些人将类似的观点归功于阿尔文·温伯格博士,他曾多年担任橡树岭国家实验室主任。他实际上引入了“超科学”这个术语,他将其定义为科学家对许多所提问题尚无答案的与政策相关的领域。他受到该实验室大量参与按照1969年《国家环境政策法》要求制定环境影响评估方法的影响。内山光教授将监管科学定义为“根据旨在促进人类健康的目标来优化科学技术发展的科学”。从本质上讲,监管科学就是为回答政治问题而产生的科学。本文将介绍监管科学,并讨论一些人所谓的“学术科学”与“监管科学”之间的差异。此外,还将简要讨论监管科学已经以及将会如何影响辐射防护实践以及所有涉及辐射和放射性使用的领域。