种植体支持的固定修复与种植体支持的可摘覆盖义齿：一项系统评价
Implant Supported Fixed Restorations versus Implant Supported Removable Overdentures: A Systematic Review.
作者信息
Selim Khaled, Ali Sherif, Reda Ahmed
机构信息
Cairo University, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Periodontology, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cairo, Egypt.
出版信息
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016 Dec 15;4(4):726-732. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.109. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
AIM
The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare implant retained fixed restoration versus implant retained over denture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Search was made in 2 databases including PubMed and PubMed Central. Title and abstract were screened to select studies comparing implant retained fixed restorations versus implant retained removable overdentures. Articles which did not follow the inclusion criteria were excluded. Included papers were then read carefully for a second stage filter, this was followed by manual searching of bibliography of selected articles.
RESULTS
The search resulted in 5 included papers. One study evaluated the masticatory function, while the other 4 evaluated the patient satisfaction. Two of them used Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as a measurement tool, while the other two used VAS and Categorical Scales (CAT). Stability, ability to chew, ability to clean, ability to speak and esthetics were the main outcomes of the 4 included papers.
CONCLUSION
Conflicting results was observed between the fixed and removable restorations.
目的
本研究旨在系统评估和比较种植体支持的固定修复与种植体支持的覆盖义齿。
材料与方法
在包括PubMed和PubMed Central在内的2个数据库中进行检索。筛选标题和摘要以选择比较种植体支持的固定修复与种植体支持的可摘覆盖义齿的研究。排除不符合纳入标准的文章。然后仔细阅读纳入的论文进行第二阶段筛选，随后手动检索所选文章的参考文献。
结果
检索结果为5篇纳入论文。1项研究评估了咀嚼功能，其他4项评估了患者满意度。其中2项使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）作为测量工具，另外2项使用VAS和分类量表（CAT）。稳定性、咀嚼能力、清洁能力、说话能力和美观是4篇纳入论文的主要结果。
结论
固定修复和可摘修复之间观察到相互矛盾的结果。
Zotero 插件