• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Quality of Care for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的护理质量
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):569-576. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4409-6. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
2
Development of quality measures for the care of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者护理质量指标的制定
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):874-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
3
Focus on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR): new pragmatic insights in clinical practice.关注胃食管反流(GER)和喉咽反流(LPR):临床实践中的新实用见解。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32(1 Suppl. 2):41-47.
4
[TYPICAL ERRORS IN THERAPY OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE].
Klin Med (Mosk). 2017;95(2):163-7.
5
The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;98(3 Suppl):S8-S14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00010-8.
6
[Gastroesophageal reflux disease: current views and prospects].
Klin Med (Mosk). 2016;94(7):485-96.
7
Changing impact of gastroesophageal reflux in medical and otolaryngology practice.胃食管反流在医学及耳鼻喉科临床实践中的影响变化
Laryngoscope. 2005 Jul;115(7):1145-53. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000165464.75164.E5.
8
Discerning differences: gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants.辨别差异:婴儿胃食管反流与胃食管反流病
Adv Neonatal Care. 2004 Aug;4(4):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2004.05.006.
9
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE CLINICAL TREATMENT.胃食管反流病临床治疗的历史视角
Arq Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug 13;56(2):202-208. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201900000-41.
10
Unmet medical needs among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a foundation for improving management in primary care.胃食管反流病患者未满足的医疗需求:改善基层医疗管理的基础。
Dig Dis. 2009;27(1):62-7. doi: 10.1159/000210106. Epub 2009 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate-based medical devices: formulations, esophageal mucosal protection, and their place in the management of GERD.基于透明质酸和硫酸软骨素的医疗器械:制剂、食管黏膜保护及其在胃食管反流病管理中的地位。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 11;18:17562848251337822. doi: 10.1177/17562848251337822. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient journey in gastroesophageal reflux disease: real-world perspectives from Italian gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, and ENT specialists.胃食管反流病患者的就医历程:来自意大利胃肠病学家、初级保健医生和耳鼻喉科专家的真实视角
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 22;17:17562848241239590. doi: 10.1177/17562848241239590. eCollection 2024.
3
Best Practices in Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Multidisciplinary Modified Delphi Study.喉咽反流病治疗的最佳实践:一项多学科改良德尔菲研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1125-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07672-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
Direct Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan Versus Proton-Pump Inhibitors for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vonoprazan 与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的疗效和安全性的直接比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06141-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
Magnetic sphincter augmentation: Optimal patient selection and referral care pathways.磁括约肌增强术:最佳患者选择及转诊护理路径
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug 16;11(8):472-476. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.472.
6
The Proton Pump Inhibitor Nonresponder: a Behavioral Approach to Improvement and Wellness.质子泵抑制剂无反应者:改善与健康的行为学方法
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Jun 9;20(7):34. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0641-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.口咽pH值检测不能预测有喉部症状患者对质子泵抑制剂治疗的反应。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1517-1524. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.145. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
2
Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Risk of Dementia: A Pharmacoepidemiological Claims Data Analysis.质子泵抑制剂与痴呆风险的关联:基于药物流行病学索赔数据分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Apr;73(4):410-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4791.
3
Abilities of Oropharyngeal pH Tests and Salivary Pepsin Analysis to Discriminate Between Asymptomatic Volunteers and Subjects With Symptoms of Laryngeal Irritation.口咽pH测试和唾液胃蛋白酶分析鉴别无症状志愿者与有喉部刺激症状受试者的能力。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):535-542.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
4
Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery versus medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults.成人胃食管反流病(GORD)的腹腔镜胃底折叠术与药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;2015(11):CD003243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003243.pub3.
5
Lifestyle Intervention in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的生活方式干预
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):175-82.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.176. Epub 2015 May 6.
6
Measuring Vital Signs: an IOM report on core metrics for health and health care progress.测量生命体征:美国医学研究所关于健康与医疗进展核心指标的一份报告。
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1901-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4862.
7
Revision of failed transoral incisionless fundoplication by subsequent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.通过后续的腹腔镜nissen胃底折叠术对失败的经口无切口胃底折叠术进行翻修。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17115-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17115.
8
Quality indicators for EGD.上消化道内镜检查的质量指标
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
9
Development of quality measures for the care of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者护理质量指标的制定
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):874-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
No evidence for efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.没有证据表明射频消融治疗胃食管反流病有效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;13(6):1058-67.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

胃食管反流病的护理质量

The Quality of Care for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

作者信息

Yadlapati Rena, Dakhoul Lara, Pandolfino John E, Keswani Rajesh N

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St. Clair St. Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Chicago/Advocate Christ Medical Center, University of Illinois, Oak Lawn, IL, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):569-576. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4409-6. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-016-4409-6
PMID:28028689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5768307/
Abstract

Improving the quality of healthcare delivery is a cornerstone of modern medical care shared between all stakeholders. However, effectively improving quality requires both an understanding of the tenets of healthcare quality and how they relate to an individual disease process. This is especially important for common diseases, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), where wide variations in practice exist. The high prevalence of GERD coupled with wide variation in clinical approach results in significant economic burden and poor quality of care. Thus, GERD serves as a useful framework to highlight the opportunities and current challenges of delivering high-quality care. In this article, we identify quality metrics in GERD and the areas in need of research to improve the quality of the management of GERD. Additionally, we suggest strategies for improvement as it relates to the proper diagnostic testing utilization and the decision-making process.

摘要

提高医疗服务质量是所有利益相关者共同关注的现代医疗的基石。然而,有效提高质量既需要理解医疗质量的原则,也需要理解这些原则与个体疾病过程的关系。这对于常见疾病,如胃食管反流病(GERD)尤为重要,因为在GERD的治疗实践中存在很大差异。GERD的高患病率加上临床治疗方法的广泛差异,导致了巨大的经济负担和较差的医疗质量。因此,GERD是一个有用的框架,可用于突出提供高质量医疗服务的机会和当前面临的挑战。在本文中,我们确定了GERD的质量指标以及需要开展研究以提高GERD管理质量的领域。此外,我们还提出了与正确使用诊断测试和决策过程相关的改进策略。