Kuhlmann S M, Huss M, Bürger A, Hammerle F
Department for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Department University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Center of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Fuechsleinstraße 15, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 28;16(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0833-8.
High prevalence rates of psychological distress in medical training and later professional life indicate a need for prevention. Different types of intervention were shown to have good effects, but little is known about the relative efficacy of different types of stress management interventions, and methodological limitations have been reported. In order to overcome some of these limitations, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of a specifically developed mindfulness-based stress prevention training for medical students (MediMind) on measures of distress, coping and psychological morbidity.
We report on a prospective randomized controlled trial with three study conditions: experimental treatment (MediMind), standard treatment (Autogenic Training) and a control group without treatment. The sample consisted of medical or dental students in the second or eighth semester. They completed self-report questionnaires at baseline, after the training and at one year follow-up. Distress (Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress, TICS) was assessed as the primary outcome and coping (Brief COPE) as a co-primary outcome. Effects on the psychological morbidity (Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI) as a secondary outcome were expected one year after the trainings.
Initially, N = 183 students were randomly allocated to the study groups. At one year follow-up N = 80 could be included into the per-protocol analysis: MediMind (n =31), Autogenic Training (n = 32) and control group (n = 17). A selective drop-out for students who suffered more often from psychological symptoms was detected (p = .020). MANCOVA's on TICS and Brief COPE revealed no significant interaction effects. On the BSI, a significant overall interaction effect became apparent (p = .002, η2partial = .382), but post hoc analyses were not significant. Means of the Global Severity Index (BSI) indicated that MediMind may contribute to a decrease in psychological morbidity.
Due to the high and selective dropout rates, the results cannot be generalized and further research is necessary. Since the participation rate of the trainings was high, a need for further prevention programs is indicated. The study gives important suggestions on further implementation and evaluation of stress prevention in medical schools.
This trial is recorded at German Clinical Trials Register under the number DRKS00005354 (08.11.2013).
医学培训及后续职业生涯中心理困扰的高患病率表明有必要进行预防。已证明不同类型的干预措施有良好效果,但对于不同类型压力管理干预措施的相对疗效了解甚少,且已有研究报道了方法学上的局限性。为了克服其中一些局限性,本研究旨在评估专门为医学生开发的基于正念的压力预防培训(MediMind)对困扰、应对方式和心理疾病指标的影响。
我们报告了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,设有三种研究条件:实验性治疗(MediMind)、标准治疗(自生训练)和无治疗的对照组。样本包括第二学期或第八学期的医学或牙医学专业学生。他们在基线、培训后及一年随访时完成自我报告问卷。将困扰(慢性应激评估的特里尔问卷,TICS)作为主要结局进行评估,应对方式(简易应对方式问卷,Brief COPE)作为共同主要结局进行评估。预计培训一年后对作为次要结局的心理疾病(简明症状量表,BSI)会产生影响。
最初,183名学生被随机分配到各研究组。在一年随访时,80名学生可纳入符合方案分析:MediMind组(n = 31)、自生训练组(n = 32)和对照组(n = 17)。发现心理症状出现频率较高的学生存在选择性失访情况(p = 0.020)。对TICS和Brief COPE进行的多变量协方差分析未发现显著的交互作用效应。在BSI上,出现了显著的总体交互作用效应(p = 0.002,偏η² = 0.382),但事后分析不显著。全球严重程度指数(BSI)的均值表明,MediMind可能有助于降低心理疾病的发生率。
由于高失访率和选择性失访情况,研究结果无法推广,需要进一步研究。鉴于培训的参与率较高,表明有必要开展更多预防项目。该研究为医学院校进一步实施和评估压力预防提供了重要建议。
本试验已在德国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为DRKS00005354(2013年11月8日)。