Department of Hematology & Oncology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):836-842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw685.
The aim of this study was to evaluate patient preference and satisfaction for the subcutaneous (s.c.) versus intravenous (i.v.) formulation of rituximab given with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL).
Patients received eight cycles of rituximab according to 2 schedules: Arm A received 1 cycle rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) and 3 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg) then 4 cycles rituximab i.v.; Arm B received 4 cycles rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) then 4 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg). Alongside rituximab, both arms received 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP), or bendamustine as per standard local practice). Preference for s.c. or i.v. administration was evaluated using the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) at cycles 6 and 8. Patient satisfaction and convenience were assessed using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) at cycles 4 and 8.
At the primary data cut-off (19 January 2015), the intent-to-treat population comprised 743 patients. The majority had DLBCL (63%) and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. At cycle 8, 81% of patients completing the PPQ preferred rituximab s.c. Preference was not impacted by treatment sequence or disease type. Patient satisfaction as measured by RASQ was higher for s.c. versus i.v. CTSQ scores were similar between arms. Adverse events were generally balanced between administration routes and no new safety signals were detected.
Most previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL preferred s.c. to i.v. rituximab administration. Patient satisfaction with rituximab treatment was generally greater with s.c. administration.
NCT01724021 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
本研究旨在评估初治 CD20+弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)或滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者中,与静脉(iv)给药相比,接受皮下(sc)给药利妥昔单抗联合化疗的患者偏好和满意度。
患者接受了 8 个周期的利妥昔单抗治疗,方案如下:A 组第 1 个周期接受 iv 利妥昔单抗(375mg/m2),3 个周期 sc 利妥昔单抗(1400mg),随后接受 4 个周期 iv 利妥昔单抗;B 组接受 4 个周期 iv 利妥昔单抗(375mg/m2),随后接受 4 个周期 sc 利妥昔单抗(1400mg)。与利妥昔单抗联合应用的还有,根据当地标准实践,所有患者均接受 6-8 个周期的化疗(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松(CHOP)、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松(CVP)或苯达莫司汀)。在第 6 个周期和第 8 个周期,使用患者偏好问卷(PPQ)评估患者对 sc 或 iv 给药的偏好。在第 4 个周期和第 8 个周期,使用癌症治疗满意度问卷(CTSQ)和利妥昔单抗给药满意度问卷(RASQ)评估患者的满意度和便利性。
在主要数据截止日期(2015 年 1 月 19 日),意向治疗人群包括 743 名患者。大多数患者患有 DLBCL(63%),两组基线特征平衡。在第 8 个周期,完成 PPQ 的 81%的患者更喜欢 sc 利妥昔单抗。治疗顺序或疾病类型并未影响患者的偏好。使用 RASQ 测量的患者满意度更高,sc 组的满意度高于 iv 组。CTSQ 评分在两组之间相似。不良反应通常在给药途径之间平衡,未发现新的安全性信号。
大多数初治 CD20+DLBCL 或 FL 患者更喜欢 sc 给药而不是 iv 给药。与 iv 给药相比,sc 给药时患者对利妥昔单抗治疗的满意度通常更高。
NCT01724021(ClinicalTrials.gov)。