Suppr超能文献

未接受治疗的 CD20+弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤或滤泡性淋巴瘤患者对利妥昔单抗皮下或静脉给药的偏好:来自一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、交叉研究(PrefMab)的结果。

Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study (PrefMab).

机构信息

Department of Hematology & Oncology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):836-842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw685.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient preference and satisfaction for the subcutaneous (s.c.) versus intravenous (i.v.) formulation of rituximab given with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received eight cycles of rituximab according to 2 schedules: Arm A received 1 cycle rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) and 3 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg) then 4 cycles rituximab i.v.; Arm B received 4 cycles rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) then 4 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg). Alongside rituximab, both arms received 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP), or bendamustine as per standard local practice). Preference for s.c. or i.v. administration was evaluated using the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) at cycles 6 and 8. Patient satisfaction and convenience were assessed using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) at cycles 4 and 8.

RESULTS

At the primary data cut-off (19 January 2015), the intent-to-treat population comprised 743 patients. The majority had DLBCL (63%) and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. At cycle 8, 81% of patients completing the PPQ preferred rituximab s.c. Preference was not impacted by treatment sequence or disease type. Patient satisfaction as measured by RASQ was higher for s.c. versus i.v. CTSQ scores were similar between arms. Adverse events were generally balanced between administration routes and no new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSION

Most previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL preferred s.c. to i.v. rituximab administration. Patient satisfaction with rituximab treatment was generally greater with s.c. administration.

REGISTERED CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT01724021 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估初治 CD20+弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)或滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者中,与静脉(iv)给药相比,接受皮下(sc)给药利妥昔单抗联合化疗的患者偏好和满意度。

方法

患者接受了 8 个周期的利妥昔单抗治疗,方案如下:A 组第 1 个周期接受 iv 利妥昔单抗(375mg/m2),3 个周期 sc 利妥昔单抗(1400mg),随后接受 4 个周期 iv 利妥昔单抗;B 组接受 4 个周期 iv 利妥昔单抗(375mg/m2),随后接受 4 个周期 sc 利妥昔单抗(1400mg)。与利妥昔单抗联合应用的还有,根据当地标准实践,所有患者均接受 6-8 个周期的化疗(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松(CHOP)、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松(CVP)或苯达莫司汀)。在第 6 个周期和第 8 个周期,使用患者偏好问卷(PPQ)评估患者对 sc 或 iv 给药的偏好。在第 4 个周期和第 8 个周期,使用癌症治疗满意度问卷(CTSQ)和利妥昔单抗给药满意度问卷(RASQ)评估患者的满意度和便利性。

结果

在主要数据截止日期(2015 年 1 月 19 日),意向治疗人群包括 743 名患者。大多数患者患有 DLBCL(63%),两组基线特征平衡。在第 8 个周期,完成 PPQ 的 81%的患者更喜欢 sc 利妥昔单抗。治疗顺序或疾病类型并未影响患者的偏好。使用 RASQ 测量的患者满意度更高,sc 组的满意度高于 iv 组。CTSQ 评分在两组之间相似。不良反应通常在给药途径之间平衡,未发现新的安全性信号。

结论

大多数初治 CD20+DLBCL 或 FL 患者更喜欢 sc 给药而不是 iv 给药。与 iv 给药相比,sc 给药时患者对利妥昔单抗治疗的满意度通常更高。

注册临床试验编号

NCT01724021(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验