Suppr超能文献

引入在线系统对肘关节置换术后随访的影响。

Effect of introducing an online system on the follow-up of elbow arthroplasty.

作者信息

Viveen Jetske, Prkic Ante, The Bertram, Koenraadt Koen L M, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Jetske Viveen, Ante Prkic, Bertram The, Denise Eygendaal, Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2016 Dec 18;7(12):826-831. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.826.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effect of introducing a structured online follow-up system on the response rate.

METHODS

Since June 2015 we have set up an electronic follow-up system for prosthesis in orthopedic patients. This system allows prospective data gathering using both online and paper questionnaires. In the past all patients received questionnaires on paper. This study includes only patients who received elbow arthroplasty. Response rates before and after introduction of the online database were compared. After the implementation, completeness of the questionnaires was compared between paper and digital versions. For both comparisons Fisher's Exact tests were used.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were included in the study. With the introduction of this online follow-up system, the overall response rate increased from 49.8% to 91.6% ( < 0.01). The response rate of 92.0% in the paper group was comparable to 90.7% in the online group ( > 0.05). Paper questionnaires had a completeness of 54.4%, which was lower compared to the online questionnaires where we reached full completeness ( < 0.01). Furthermore, non-responders proved to be younger with a mean age of 52 years compared to a mean age 62 years of responders ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of a structured online follow-up system increased the response rate. Moreover, online questionnaires are more complete than paper questionnaires.

摘要

目的

评估引入结构化在线随访系统对回复率的影响。

方法

自2015年6月起,我们为骨科患者建立了一个假体电子随访系统。该系统允许使用在线问卷和纸质问卷收集前瞻性数据。过去,所有患者均收到纸质问卷。本研究仅纳入接受肘关节置换术的患者。比较引入在线数据库前后的回复率。实施后,比较纸质版和数字版问卷的完整性。对于这两项比较,均使用Fisher精确检验。

结果

本研究共纳入233例患者。随着该在线随访系统的引入,总体回复率从49.8%提高到91.6%(P<0.01)。纸质组的回复率为92.0%,与在线组的90.7%相当(P>0.05)。纸质问卷的完整性为54.4%,低于在线问卷,在线问卷的完整性达到了100%(P<0.01)。此外,未回复者的年龄更小,平均年龄为52岁,而回复者的平均年龄为62岁(P<0.05)。

结论

使用结构化在线随访系统提高了回复率。此外,在线问卷比纸质问卷更完整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/5155259/7d1b2142a1ef/WJO-7-826-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验