• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用连续定量二氧化碳描记术进行急诊科程序镇静:系统评价和成本效益分析。

Using continuous quantitative capnography for emergency department procedural sedation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 1008 RCP, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 1008 RCP, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1587-3. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-016-1587-3
PMID:28032265
Abstract

End-tidal CO has been advocated to improve safety of emergency department (ED) procedural sedation by decreasing hypoxia and catastrophic outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of routine use of continuous waveform quantitative end-tidal CO monitoring for ED procedural sedation in prevention of catastrophic events. Markov modeling was used to perform cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate societal costs per prevented catastrophic event (death or hypoxic brain injury) during routine ED procedural sedation. Estimates for efficacy of capnography and safety of sedation were derived from the literature. This model was then applied to all procedural sedations performed in US EDs with assumptions selected to maximize efficacy and minimize cost of implementation. Assuming that capnography decreases the catastrophic adverse event rate by 40.7% (proportional to efficacy in preventing hypoxia), routine use of capnography would decrease the 5-year estimated catastrophic event rate in all US EDs from 15.5 events to 9.2 events (difference 6.3 prevented events per 5 years). Over a 5-year period, implementing routine end-tidal CO monitoring would cost an estimated $2,830,326 per prevented catastrophic event, which translates into $114,007 per quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analyses suggest that reasonable assumptions continue to estimate high costs of prevented catastrophic events. Continuous waveform quantitative end-tidal CO monitoring is a very costly strategy to prevent catastrophic complications of procedural sedation when applied routinely in ED procedural sedations.

摘要

呼气末二氧化碳监测被提倡用于提高急诊科(ED)程序镇静的安全性,以降低缺氧和灾难性结局的风险。本研究旨在评估在预防灾难性事件中,常规使用连续波定量呼气末二氧化碳监测对 ED 程序镇静的成本效益。采用马尔可夫模型进行成本效益分析,以估计在常规 ED 程序镇静中,每预防一次灾难性事件(死亡或缺氧性脑损伤)的社会成本。呼气末二氧化碳监测的有效性和镇静安全性的估计值来自文献。然后将该模型应用于美国所有 ED 进行的所有程序镇静,并选择假设以最大程度地提高疗效和降低实施成本。假设呼气末二氧化碳监测将灾难性不良事件发生率降低 40.7%(与预防缺氧的疗效成比例),则常规使用呼气末二氧化碳监测将使所有美国 ED 中 5 年内预计的灾难性事件发生率从 15.5 例降低至 9.2 例(每 5 年预防 6.3 例事件)。在 5 年内,实施常规呼气末二氧化碳监测的估计成本为每预防一次灾难性事件 283.0326 美元,这相当于每质量调整生命年 114,007 美元。敏感性分析表明,合理的假设仍然估计预防灾难性事件的成本很高。连续波定量呼气末二氧化碳监测是一种非常昂贵的策略,用于预防 ED 程序镇静中灾难性并发症,当常规应用于 ED 程序镇静时。

相似文献

1
Using continuous quantitative capnography for emergency department procedural sedation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.使用连续定量二氧化碳描记术进行急诊科程序镇静:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1587-3. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
4
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.对不同患者群体中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的效果和成本相关证据的综述,以及在英国背景下对这些群体的成本效益和成本效用进行建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
9
Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study.高风险情况下的易栓症筛查:系统评价与成本效益分析。易栓症筛查的血栓形成:风险与经济评估(TREATS)研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(11):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta10110.
10
A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry's disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1.对法布里病和1型黏多糖贮积症酶替代疗法的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(20):iii-iv, ix-113. doi: 10.3310/hta10200.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of capnography for end-tidal CO monitoring during in-hospital cardiac arrest: A middle-income country perspective analysis.评估在院内心脏骤停期间呼气末二氧化碳监测中二氧化碳波形图的成本效益:从中等收入国家视角进行的分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Feb 29;40:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100373. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and procedural sedation.韩国诊断及操作镇静临床实践指南。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb;77(1):5-30. doi: 10.4097/kja.23745. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Quality of health economic evaluations in emergency medicine journals: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Capnographic Monitoring of Moderate Sedation During Low-Risk Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Safety or Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Study.低危筛查性结肠镜检查中适度镇静时的二氧化碳监测并不能提高安全性或患者满意度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):388-94. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.2. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
2
Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科接受程序性镇静的成人不良事件发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):119-34. doi: 10.1111/acem.12875. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
急诊医学期刊中卫生经济评价的质量:系统评价。
CJEM. 2023 Aug;25(8):676-688. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00535-w. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
United States Life Tables, 2011.
《2011年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Sep 22;64(11):1-63.
4
Anesthesia-Related and Perioperative Cardiac Arrest in Low- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review With Meta-Regression and Proportional Meta-Analysis.低收入和高收入国家与麻醉相关的围手术期心脏骤停:一项采用Meta回归和比例Meta分析的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1465. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001465.
5
Ketamine-Propofol Versus Propofol Alone for Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.氯胺酮-丙泊酚与单独使用丙泊酚用于急诊科程序性镇静的系统评价和Meta分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1003-13. doi: 10.1111/acem.12737. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments.丙泊酚在急诊科用于程序性镇静。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD007399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007399.pub2.
7
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Saudi Med J. 2015 Jan;36(1):46-51. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.1.9738.
8
Capnography during deep sedation with propofol by nonanesthesiologists: a randomized controlled trial.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚进行深度镇静时的二氧化碳描记法:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jul;119(1):49-55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a1f0a2.
9
Procedural sedation and analgesia for adults in the emergency department.急诊科成人患者的程序性镇静与镇痛
BMJ. 2014 May 8;348:g2965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2965.
10
Routine capnographic monitoring is not indicated for all patients undergoing emergency department procedural sedation.并非所有在急诊科接受程序性镇静的患者都需要进行常规二氧化碳监测。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):698-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.041.