Fordham University.
Am Psychol. 2016 Dec;71(9):896-897. doi: 10.1037/amp0000031.
This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned. (PsycINFO Database Record
本文提请人们注意大量未被引用的文献,这些文献使得施瓦茨、利连菲尔德、梅卡和索维涅(2016 年)重新评估神经科学在心理学中的作用的分析论点失去了意义。文中提供了在没有任何中介定律的情况下成功整合心理学和神经科学的例子。文中还提到了对培训的影响。