Abramovitch Abram, Friedmann Reuven, Zevin Shoshana, Munter Gabriel, Yinnon Amos M, Raveh-Brawer David
Department of Geriatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Medicine B, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):427-432. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14592. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
To compare the effect of a five-bed geriatric monitoring unit (MU) on in-hospital mortality and length of stay with the effect of usual care in a geriatric hospital department and a medical MU.
Prospective, case-control, noninterventional study.
All individuals hospitalized for 24 hours or longer in the geriatric MU (n = 89, aged 53-101, mean age 82.2 ± 9.6) over a period of 5 months (January-May 2015); individuals admitted to the geriatric department (n = 178, aged 55-100, mean age 83.2 ± 9.8), matched at a ratio of 1:2 according to sex, age ±5 years, and need for mechanical ventilation; and individuals admitted to a similar five-bed medical MU (n = 95, aged 35-90, mean age 68.2 ± 14.4) during the same period.
Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
The predicted death rate was 49 ± 26 for participants in the geriatric MU, 39.6 ± 27 for those in the medical MU (P = .02), and 36.7 ± 27 for those in the geriatric department (P < .001). Observed in-hospital mortality was higher for geriatric MU participants (n = 40, 44.9%) than for the department control group (n = 48, 27%) (P = .002), although the mortality ratios (actual divided by predicted death rates) of these two groups were similar, indicating that the more severely ill participants in the geriatric MU did better than control participants in the departments, in particular those requiring hemodynamic pressure support and those with acute renal failure.
For elderly, severely ill adults, care in a geriatric MU was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than care in the hospital geriatric ward and a longer stay and may be an alternative to medical MU admission.
比较五床位老年监护病房(MU)对老年医院科室和内科监护病房住院死亡率及住院时间的影响与常规护理的效果。
前瞻性、病例对照、非干预性研究。
在5个月期间(2015年1月至5月)在老年监护病房住院24小时或更长时间的所有个体(n = 89,年龄53 - 101岁,平均年龄82.2±9.6);入住老年科室的个体(n = 178,年龄55 - 100岁,平均年龄83.2±9.8),根据性别、年龄±5岁以及机械通气需求按1:2的比例匹配;同期入住类似的五床位内科监护病房的个体(n = 95,年龄35 - 90岁,平均年龄68.2±14.4)。
主要结局为住院死亡率。
老年监护病房参与者的预测死亡率为49±26,内科监护病房参与者为39.6±27(P = 0.02),老年科室参与者为36.7±27(P < 0.001)。老年监护病房参与者的观察到的住院死亡率(n = 40,44.9%)高于科室对照组(n = 48,27%)(P = 0.002),尽管这两组的死亡率比值(实际死亡率除以预测死亡率)相似,表明老年监护病房中病情较重的参与者比科室中的对照参与者表现更好,特别是那些需要血流动力学压力支持的患者和急性肾衰竭患者。
对于老年重症成人,在老年监护病房接受护理与在医院老年病房接受护理相比,住院死亡率更低,住院时间更长,可能是内科监护病房收治的一种替代选择。