• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of achieved systolic blood pressure in newly treated hypertensive patients aged 60-79 years before and after Eighth Joint National Committee recommendations.对60 - 79岁新治疗高血压患者在第八次美国国家联合委员会建议前后所达到的收缩压进行评估。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Feb;11(2):63-71. doi: 10.1177/1753944716684463. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
2
Assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension aged 60-79 years before and after the publication of the 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee report.2014年美国国家联合委员会第八次报告发布前后60至79岁高血压患者血压评估
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Apr;10(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/1753944715621000. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
3
Effect of Achieved Systolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.基于人群的回顾性队列研究:实现的收缩压对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1134-1141. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2443. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
4
Usefulness of the alpha1-blocker doxazosin as a third-line antihypertensive drug.α1受体阻滞剂多沙唑嗪作为三线抗高血压药物的效用。
Hypertens Res. 2007 Apr;30(4):301-6. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.301.
5
Combination therapy with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for blood pressure reduction and goal attainment in a real-world clinical setting in Japan.在日本的真实临床环境中,使用氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合疗法降低血压并实现治疗目标。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Dec;6(6):237-44. doi: 10.1177/1753944712464285. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
6
Medicaid prescriber compliance with Joint National Committee VI Hypertension Treatment Guidelines.医疗补助计划开处方者对《美国国家联合委员会第六版高血压治疗指南》的依从性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2002 Oct;36(10):1505-11. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A451.
7
Blood pressure goal attainment according to JNC 7 guidelines and utilization of antihypertensive drug therapy in MCO patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.根据美国国家高血压教育计划(第七次报告)(JNC 7)指南,1型或2型糖尿病管理式医疗组织(MCO)患者的血压控制目标达成情况及降压药物治疗的使用情况
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 May;12(4):303-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.4.303.
8
Hypertension control among newly treated patients before and after publication of the main ALLHAT results and JNC 7 guidelines.主要 ALLHAT 研究结果和 JNC 7 指南发表前后新治疗患者的高血压控制情况。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 May;14(5):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00609.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
Implications of the Eighth Joint National Committee Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure for Aging Adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.美国国家联合委员会第八版高血压管理指南对老年人的影响:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
Hypertension. 2015 Sep;66(3):474-80. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05560. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
Compliance with Joint National Committee 7 guidelines in hypertension management in a teaching institution.教学机构中高血压管理对美国国家联合委员会第7版指南的依从性
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):251-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860607303293.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
2
Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension.加拿大高血压协会《2016年加拿大高血压教育计划血压测量、诊断、风险评估、预防及治疗指南》
Can J Cardiol. 2016 May;32(5):569-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.066. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
3
Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):447-54. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366.
4
Assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension aged 60-79 years before and after the publication of the 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee report.2014年美国国家联合委员会第八次报告发布前后60至79岁高血压患者血压评估
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Apr;10(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/1753944715621000. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
5
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.成人高血压筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):778-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2223. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
7
White-Coat Effect Among Older Adults: Data From the Jackson Heart Study.老年人的白大衣效应:来自杰克逊心脏研究的数据。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Feb;18(2):139-45. doi: 10.1111/jch.12644. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Implications of the Eighth Joint National Committee Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure for Aging Adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.美国国家联合委员会第八版高血压管理指南对老年人的影响:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究
Hypertension. 2015 Sep;66(3):474-80. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05560. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry.2014 年高血压管理专家小组建议对当代心血管实践的影响:来自 NCDR PINNACLE 注册的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
2014 hypertension recommendations from the eighth joint national committee panel members raise concerns for elderly black and female populations.2014 年第八联合国家委员会小组委员发布的高血压建议引起了对老年黑人和女性人群的关注。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 29;64(4):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.014.

对60 - 79岁新治疗高血压患者在第八次美国国家联合委员会建议前后所达到的收缩压进行评估。

Assessment of achieved systolic blood pressure in newly treated hypertensive patients aged 60-79 years before and after Eighth Joint National Committee recommendations.

作者信息

Kelly Michael S, Saseen Joseph J, Marrs Joel C

机构信息

Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA, USA.

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Feb;11(2):63-71. doi: 10.1177/1753944716684463. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1177/1753944716684463
PMID:28033742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5933545/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients who were newly prescribed antihypertensive therapy after the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) update were treated to a relaxed systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal compared with patients treated before the update.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. Patients aged 60-79 years, without diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD), newly treated for hypertension at a University of Colorado primary care clinics were included. The mean first-achieved and last-stable SBPs of patients newly prescribed antihypertensive medications from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 31 2013 (before cohort) were compared with patients newly prescribed antihypertensive therapy from 1 January 2014 to 1 October 2015 (after cohort). The mean number of antihypertensive medications at first-achieved SBP, the time to first-achieved SBP, and the class of initial antihypertensive medications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included, 64 patients in each cohort. The coprimary outcome of first-achieved mean SBP did not differ between the groups (131.3 mmHg versus 130.2 mmHg; p = 0.65). Last-stable mean SBP values were also similar between the groups (130.2 mmHg versus 129.5 mmHg; p = 0.74). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) were the most frequently initiated antihypertensive agent in both cohorts (43.8% versus 48.4%; p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the JNC 8 recommendations did not alter SBP goals among patients aged 60-79 years newly treated for hypertension at University of Colorado primary care clinics.

摘要

目的

确定在第八次美国国家联合委员会(JNC 8)更新后新接受抗高血压治疗的患者与更新前接受治疗的患者相比,是否按照更为宽松的收缩压(SBP)目标进行治疗。

方法

一项经科罗拉多多机构审查委员会批准的回顾性队列研究。纳入年龄在60 - 79岁、无糖尿病或慢性肾脏病(CKD)且在科罗拉多大学初级保健诊所新接受高血压治疗的患者。将2012年1月1日至2013年12月31日(队列前)新开具抗高血压药物患者的首次达到且最终稳定的SBP均值,与2014年1月1日至2015年10月1日(队列后)新接受抗高血压治疗患者的进行比较。还评估了首次达到SBP时抗高血压药物的平均数量、达到首次SBP的时间以及初始抗高血压药物的类别。

结果

共纳入128例患者,每个队列64例。两组间首次达到的平均SBP这一共同主要结局无差异(131.3 mmHg对130.2 mmHg;p = 0.