Choi Jin-Woo
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dankook University College of Dentistry, Chungnam, Korea.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2016 Dec;46(4):245-249. doi: 10.5624/isd.2016.46.4.245. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
This study was designed to evaluate differences in the required visibility of anatomic structures according to the diagnostic tasks of implant planning and periapical diagnosis.
Images of a real skull phantom were acquired under 24 combinations of different exposure conditions in a cone-beam computed tomography scanner (60, 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 kV and 4, 6, 8, and 10 mA). Five radiologists evaluated the visibility of anatomic structures and the image quality for diagnostic tasks using a 6-point scale.
The visibility of the periodontal ligament space showed the closest association with the ability to use an image for periapical diagnosis in both jaws. The visibility of the sinus floor and canal wall showed the closest association with the ability to use an image for implant planning. Variations in tube voltage were associated with significant differences in image quality for all diagnostic tasks. However, tube current did not show significant associations with the ability to use an image for implant planning.
The required visibility of anatomic structures varied depending on the diagnostic task. Tube voltage was a more important exposure parameter for image quality than tube current. Different settings should be used for optimization and image quality evaluation depending on the diagnostic task.
本研究旨在根据种植体规划和根尖周诊断的诊断任务,评估解剖结构所需可视性的差异。
在锥形束计算机断层扫描仪中,于24种不同曝光条件组合(60、70、80、90、100和110 kV以及4、6、8和10 mA)下采集真实颅骨模型的图像。五名放射科医生使用6分制评估解剖结构的可视性以及用于诊断任务的图像质量。
在上下颌中,牙周膜间隙的可视性与使用图像进行根尖周诊断的能力显示出最密切关联。窦底和管壁的可视性与使用图像进行种植体规划的能力显示出最密切关联。管电压的变化与所有诊断任务的图像质量显著差异相关。然而,管电流与使用图像进行种植体规划的能力未显示出显著关联。
解剖结构所需的可视性因诊断任务而异。对于图像质量而言,管电压是比管电流更重要的曝光参数。应根据诊断任务使用不同设置进行优化和图像质量评估。