Suppr超能文献

使用具有簇信号噪声分析的 CB MercuRay 系统确定颌骨的牙牙槽结构的最佳曝光参数。

Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

出版信息

Oral Radiol. 2019 Sep;35(3):260-271. doi: 10.1007/s11282-018-0348-6. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimum cone beam computed tomography exposure parameters for specific diagnostic tasks.

METHODS

A Teflon phantom attached to a half-mandible in a large container was scanned in dental (D), implant (I), and panoramic (P) modes. An identical phantom in a small container was scanned in D mode. Both were scanned at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV. We evaluated the image quality of five anatomical structures [dentinoenamel junction (1), lamina dura and periodontal ligament space (2), trabecular pattern (3), cortex-spongy bone junction (4), and pulp chamber and root canal (5)] and analyzed the diagnostic image quality with cluster signal-to-noise analysis. We then evaluated correlations between the two image qualities and calculated the threshold of acceptable diagnostic image quality. Optimum exposure parameters were determined from images with acceptable diagnostic image quality.

RESULTS

For the small container, the optimum exposure parameters were D mode, 80 kV for (1), (3), and (4) and D mode, 100 kV for (5). For the large container, they were D mode, 120 kV for (1), (3), and (5) and D mode, 100 kV for (4). I mode, 120 kV reached the acceptable level for (4). No images reached the acceptable level for (2).

CONCLUSIONS

No optimum exposure parameters were identified for the evaluation of the lamina dura and periodontal ligament space. D mode was sufficient for the other structures; however, the tube voltage required for each structure differed. Smaller patients required lower tube voltage. I mode, 120 kV may be used for larger lesions.

摘要

目的

确定特定诊断任务的最佳锥形束计算机断层扫描曝光参数。

方法

将一个附有半下颌骨的特氟龙体模放置在一个大容器中,以口腔(D)、种植(I)和全景(P)模式进行扫描。将相同的体模放置在一个小容器中,仅在 D 模式下进行扫描。两者均以 60、80、100 和 120 kV 进行扫描。我们评估了五个解剖结构的图像质量[牙釉质牙本质交界处(1)、硬脑膜和牙周韧带间隙(2)、小梁模式(3)、皮质-海绵骨交界处(4)和牙髓腔和根管(5)],并使用聚类信噪比分析来分析诊断图像质量。然后,我们评估了两种图像质量之间的相关性,并计算了可接受的诊断图像质量的阈值。从具有可接受的诊断图像质量的图像中确定最佳曝光参数。

结果

对于小容器,最佳的曝光参数为 D 模式、80 kV 用于(1)、(3)和(4),D 模式、100 kV 用于(5)。对于大容器,最佳的曝光参数为 D 模式、120 kV 用于(1)、(3)和(5),D 模式、100 kV 用于(4)。I 模式、120 kV 可达到(4)的可接受水平。没有图像达到(2)的可接受水平。

结论

没有确定评估硬脑膜和牙周韧带间隙的最佳曝光参数。D 模式足以用于其他结构;然而,每个结构所需的管电压不同。较小的患者需要较低的管电压。I 模式、120 kV 可能适用于较大的病变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验