Risberg Kajsa, Cederlund Harald, Pell Mikael, Arthurson Veronica, Schnürer Anna
Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:529-538. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
The growing number of biogas plants in Europe has resulted in increased production of nutrient-rich digestate with great potential as fertilizer for arable land. The nutrient composition of digestate varies with the substrate treated in the biogas plant and may contain compounds that stimulate or inhibit soil microbial activity. This study compared 20 digestates (D) with 10 pig slurries (PS) and 10 cow manures (CM) regarding their chemical content and their effect on soil microbial activities, i.e. potential ammonia oxidation rate (PAO) and soil respiration. The results showed no significant differences within the D group when divided based on substrate type. i.e. manure dominated vs. other organic waste materials in any of the tests. In general D contained significantly higher concentrations of ammonium while the concentrations of total carbon and volatile fatty acids were higher in PS and CM than in D. The D showed both stimulating and inhibiting effects on PAO, while all CM and all PS except one showed inhibiting effects on PAO. However, PAO activity was negatively correlated with the content of volatile fatty acids in the residues indicating that these compounds may be the cause of the inhibition. The maximum respiration activity (h) was lower and the time point for the maximum respiration activity (t) occurred earlier for D compared with CM and PS. This earlier peak time could be indicative of a high proportion of easily degradable carbon in D compared with PS and CM. However, the utilization rate of carbon, i.e. the proportion of added organic C converted to CO-C during 12days, did not differ significantly between D, PS and CM, indicating that overall carbon quality in the different fertilizers was still roughly comparable. In short, our results suggest that digestates were different compared with PS and CM but without posing a higher risk with respect to their impact on soil microbial activity.
欧洲沼气厂数量的不断增加,使得营养丰富的沼渣产量增加,沼渣作为耕地肥料具有巨大潜力。沼渣的营养成分因沼气厂处理的底物而异,可能含有刺激或抑制土壤微生物活性的化合物。本研究比较了20种沼渣(D)、10种猪粪(PS)和10种牛粪(CM)的化学含量及其对土壤微生物活性的影响,即潜在氨氧化率(PAO)和土壤呼吸。结果表明,根据底物类型划分,D组内无显著差异,即在任何测试中,以粪便为主的底物与其他有机废料相比无显著差异。总体而言,D中的铵浓度显著更高,而PS和CM中的总碳和挥发性脂肪酸浓度高于D。D对PAO既表现出刺激作用,也表现出抑制作用,而所有CM和除一种外的所有PS对PAO均表现出抑制作用。然而,PAO活性与残留物中挥发性脂肪酸的含量呈负相关,表明这些化合物可能是抑制作用的原因。与CM和PS相比,D的最大呼吸活性(h)较低,最大呼吸活性出现的时间点(t)更早。这个更早的峰值时间可能表明,与PS和CM相比,D中易降解碳的比例更高。然而,碳的利用率,即在12天内添加的有机碳转化为CO-C的比例,在D、PS和CM之间没有显著差异,这表明不同肥料中的总体碳质量仍大致相当。简而言之,我们的结果表明,沼渣与PS和CM不同,但在对土壤微生物活性的影响方面不存在更高的风险。