Hemmingsen C, Poulsen J A, Risbo A
Department of Anaesthesiology, Holbaek Central Hospital, Denmark.
Br J Anaesth. 1989 Sep;63(3):340-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.3.340.
Forty-eight patients scheduled to undergo spinal anaesthesia were allocated to three groups of 16 each according to ASA classification I-II-III. Each patient received a fluid load of 7 ml kg-1 and either ephedrine 12.5 mg i.v. and 37.5 mg i.m., or placebo. Twelve patients in the placebo groups developed a maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure exceeding 20%. Five of these (one in ASA II and four in ASA III) developed a decrease exceeding 33% and required treatment. In ASA risk group III, all patients in the placebo group had a decrease in mean arterial pressure exceeding 20%; in 50% of these patients, the decrease exceeded 33%. We conclude that prophylactic ephedrine is desirable for spinal anaesthesia, especially in ASA III patients.
48例计划接受脊髓麻醉的患者根据美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级I-II-III被分为三组,每组16例。每位患者接受7 ml/kg的液体负荷,并静脉注射12.5 mg麻黄碱和肌肉注射37.5 mg麻黄碱,或使用安慰剂。安慰剂组中有12例患者平均动脉压最大降幅超过20%。其中5例(1例ASA II级和4例ASA III级)降幅超过33%,需要治疗。在ASA风险组III中,安慰剂组所有患者平均动脉压降幅超过20%;其中50%的患者降幅超过33%。我们得出结论,脊髓麻醉时预防性使用麻黄碱是可取的,尤其是对于ASA III级患者。