Suppr超能文献

软脑膜转移瘤:RANO关于疗效评估标准的提议

Leptomeningeal metastases: a RANO proposal for response criteria.

作者信息

Chamberlain Marc, Junck Larry, Brandsma Dieta, Soffietti Riccardo, Rudà Roberta, Raizer Jeffrey, Boogerd Willem, Taillibert Sophie, Groves Morris D, Le Rhun Emilie, Walker Julie, van den Bent Martin, Wen Patrick Y, Jaeckle Kurt A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Neuro Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):484-492. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now183.

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) currently lack standardization with respect to response assessment. A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group with expertise in LM developed a consensus proposal for evaluating patients treated for this disease. Three basic elements in assessing response in LM are proposed: a standardized neurological examination, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) cytology or flow cytometry, and radiographic evaluation. The group recommends that all patients enrolling in clinical trials undergo CSF analysis (cytology in all cancers; flow cytometry in hematologic cancers), complete contrast-enhanced neuraxis MRI, and in instances of planned intra-CSF therapy, radioisotope CSF flow studies. In conjunction with the RANO Neurological Assessment working group, a standardized instrument was created for assessing the neurological exam in patients with LM. Considering that most lesions in LM are nonmeasurable and that assessment of neuroimaging in LM is subjective, neuroimaging is graded as stable, progressive, or improved using a novel radiological LM response scorecard. Radiographic disease progression in isolation (ie, negative CSF cytology/flow cytometry and stable neurological assessment) would be defined as LM disease progression. The RANO LM working group has proposed a method of response evaluation for patients with LM that will require further testing, validation, and likely refinement with use.

摘要

软脑膜转移(LM)目前在疗效评估方面缺乏标准化。一个由软脑膜转移领域专家组成的神经肿瘤学疗效评估(RANO)工作组针对患有这种疾病的患者制定了一项评估共识提案。提出了评估软脑膜转移疗效的三个基本要素:标准化的神经系统检查、脑脊液(CSF)细胞学检查或流式细胞术以及影像学评估。该小组建议所有参与临床试验的患者都要接受脑脊液分析(所有癌症进行细胞学检查;血液系统癌症进行流式细胞术检查)、全脑全脊髓增强磁共振成像(MRI),以及在计划进行脑脊液内治疗的情况下进行放射性核素脑脊液流动研究。与RANO神经学评估工作组合作,创建了一种用于评估软脑膜转移患者神经系统检查的标准化工具。鉴于软脑膜转移中的大多数病变不可测量,且软脑膜转移的神经影像学评估具有主观性,使用一种新颖的软脑膜转移影像学疗效评分卡将神经影像学分为稳定、进展或改善。孤立的影像学疾病进展(即脑脊液细胞学检查/流式细胞术阴性且神经系统评估稳定)将被定义为软脑膜转移疾病进展。RANO软脑膜转移工作组提出了一种针对软脑膜转移患者的疗效评估方法,该方法需要进一步测试、验证,并可能在使用过程中进行完善。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Rare cell capture technology for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors.实体瘤脑脊髓液转移的稀有细胞捕获技术。
Neurology. 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1598-605; discussion 1603. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828f183f. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验