• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的助产服务。沃尔默韦尔研究;分娩选择、分娩方式、围产期死亡率和婴儿发病率。

Midwifery in The Netherlands. The Wormerveer study; selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity.

作者信息

van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers P E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Jun;96(6):656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x
PMID:2803988
Abstract

Between 1969 and 1983 a group of 7980 pregnant women, booked consecutively at a practice of freestanding midwives in Wormerveer, the Netherlands, was studied. They gave birth to 8055 children. Perinatal mortality in the total group was low (11.1 per 1000) compared with national figures of 14.5 per 1000 between 1969 and 1983. The highest mortality (51.7 per 1000) was found in the group of 1430 infants born after maternal referral during pregnancy to a specialist obstetrician. The perinatal mortality in the group selected during pregnancy as low-risk cases was very low (2.3 per 1000). The caesarean section rate in the total group was 1.4% and 0.4% in the selected low-risk group. Of the 5985 infants born alive under sole care of a midwife, 3.8% were admitted to hospital. Emergency admission because of birth asphyxia occurred in 0.4%. Convulsions within 48 h of birth at term occurred in seven (0.9 per 1000) in the total group and in five infants born in the selected group (0.8 per 1000). Selection of pregnant women into groups with high and with low risk is possible with the relatively modest means available to the midwife.

摘要

1969年至1983年间,对荷兰沃尔默维尔一群连续在独立助产士诊所登记的7980名孕妇进行了研究。她们共生下8055名儿童。与1969年至1983年间全国每1000例14.5的围产期死亡率相比,该组的围产期死亡率较低(每1000例11.1)。在孕期由专科产科医生接诊的1430名婴儿中,死亡率最高(每1000例51.7)。孕期被选为低风险病例组的围产期死亡率非常低(每1000例2.3)。该组的剖宫产率为1.4%,在选定的低风险组中为0.4%。在仅由助产士护理下存活出生的5985名婴儿中,3.8%被送进医院。因出生窒息而急诊入院的比例为0.4%。足月出生后48小时内惊厥在该组中有7例(每1000例0.9),在选定组中出生的5名婴儿中(每1000例0.8)。助产士可用的手段相对有限,但仍有可能将孕妇分为高风险组和低风险组。

相似文献

1
Midwifery in The Netherlands. The Wormerveer study; selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity.荷兰的助产服务。沃尔默韦尔研究;分娩选择、分娩方式、围产期死亡率和婴儿发病率。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Jun;96(6):656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x.
2
Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study.围产儿死亡率和低危与高危足月妊娠的严重发病率:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2010 Nov 2;341:c5639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5639.
3
Intrapartum and neonatal mortality among low-risk women in midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: a propensity score matched study.荷兰阿姆斯特丹地区由助产士主导护理与由产科医生主导护理的低风险女性的产时及新生儿死亡率:一项倾向得分匹配研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;8(1):e018845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018845.
4
Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.荷兰阿姆斯特丹地区由初级助产士主导和二级产科医生主导护理下的产时及新生儿死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2015 Dec;31(12):1168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in low-risk term women in midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care at the onset of labor: A national matched cohort study.低危足月产妇在产程启动时接受助产士主导的护理和产科医生主导的护理的产时和新生儿死亡率:一项全国匹配队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Apr;99(4):546-554. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13767. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
The influence of antenatal care on pregnancy outcome.产前护理对妊娠结局的影响。
Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;1(1):67-71.
7
A study of the biosocial factors affecting perinatal mortality in an Egyptian maternity hospital.一项关于埃及一家妇产医院影响围产期死亡率的生物社会因素的研究。
Popul Sci. 1981(2):71-90.
8
Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population.荷兰助产实践中护理的详细登记:健康孕妇人群内研究的机会。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03053-0.
9
Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.对于低风险初产妇分娩,独立助产单元是产科单元的安全替代选择吗?一项匹配队列研究中按产次分析效应差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1208-1.
10
Grand multiparity: an obstetric or neonatal risk factor?多产:是产科还是新生儿危险因素?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;158(5):1034-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90213-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.基于科学网的助产术研究论文计量分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 11;16:677-692. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398218. eCollection 2023.
2
Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010-2012: a population-based cohort study.2010 - 2012年荷兰围产期死亡率审计:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e005652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005652.
3
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
由注册助产士接生的计划在家分娩与由助产士或医生接生的计划在医院分娩的结局比较。
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
4
Advancing normal birth: organizations, goals, and research.推动正常分娩:组织、目标与研究
J Perinat Educ. 2005 Spring;14(2):40-8. doi: 10.1624/105812405X44727.
5
Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study.澳大利亚与计划在家分娩相关的围产期死亡:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):384-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.384.
6
Women's views of the place of confinement.女性对 confinement 场所的看法。 (注:“confinement”在这里结合语境可能有“坐月子”等类似含义,但仅从字面看是“限制、禁闭”等意思,具体准确意思需结合更多上下文确定)
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):77-80.
7
Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team.家庭分娩与医院分娩:对手术及结局匹配对的随访研究。苏黎世研究团队。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1313-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1313.
8
Active management of labour.产程积极管理
BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.378.
9
Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?英国是否应该进行家庭分娩与医院分娩的对比试验?
BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):753-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.753.
10
[Contra home delivery].
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1995;257(1-4):520-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02264880.