Institute of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, PR China; Rural Environment Protection Engineering & Technology Center of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, PR China.
Institute of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, PR China; Rural Environment Protection Engineering & Technology Center of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, PR China.
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Mar;227:286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.060. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Acid-buffering of VCBC and VC was evaluated using 4 VFAs, and their application on anaerobic digestion of CM and KW was investigated. Results indicated acid-buffering capacity of VCBC to acetic, propionic, butyric, and valeric acid was 2.5, 1.1, 1.9 and 1.6-fold higher comparing with VC. CM digestion was not initiated at higher organic loading of 50gTS/kg, while it worked well with 5.0% VCBC or VC. KW was not digested even though VC or VCBC was increased to 15% and 20%. However, KW digestion can be alleviated with increasing VCBC or VC proportion, in which the alleviation by VCBC was better than VC. Average VFAs concentration during CM digestion with VC was 4077.7mg/L comparing with 2835.8mg/L of VCBC, and biogas release was delayed for 10-days accompanying rapid pH decrease in CM digestion with VC, which reflected acid-buffering of biochar played a crucial role on improving anaerobic digestion.
采用 4 种挥发性脂肪酸(VFAs)评估 VCBC 和 VC 的缓冲能力,并研究其在 CM 和 KW 厌氧消化中的应用。结果表明,与 VC 相比,VCBC 对乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和戊酸的缓冲能力分别高出 2.5、1.1、1.9 和 1.6 倍。在较高的有机负荷 50gTS/kg 下,CM 消化没有启动,但在 5.0% VCBC 或 VC 下效果良好。即使 VC 或 VCBC 增加到 15%和 20%,KW 也没有被消化。然而,随着 VCBC 或 VC 比例的增加,KW 的消化可以得到缓解,其中 VCBC 的缓解效果优于 VC。在 VC 进行 CM 消化期间,VFAs 的平均浓度为 4077.7mg/L,而 VCBC 的浓度为 2835.8mg/L,并且随着 VC 进行 CM 消化时 pH 值的迅速下降,沼气的释放被延迟了 10 天,这反映出生物炭的缓冲能力在改善厌氧消化方面起着至关重要的作用。