Kawakami Camila Martins, Máximo Leandro Nériton Cândido, Fontanezi Bianca Bueno, da Silva Roberto Santana, Gaspar Lorena Rigo
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Chemistry, Goiano Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Urutaí, Goiás 75790-000, Brazil.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Mar 1;99:299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the photochemical behavior of DHHB and its photostabilizing effect on avobenzone (AVO) in different sunscreen formulations. The formulations were subjected to photostability studies by HPLC and spectrophotometry. In vitro phototoxicity was assessed using 3T3 fibroblast cultures. The mechanism of interaction between DHHB and AVO was investigated by steady state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. All formulations provided ultra-protection against UVA radiation. HPLC results demonstrated that DHHB did not present a photostabilizing effect on AVO. Fluorescence spectroscopy showed that AVO and DHHB interact by a static quenching mechanism and DHHB did not affect the AVO excited state lifetime. In addition, the energy transfer by Förster mechanism (FRET), which is the most often mechanism responsible for singlet-singlet quenching, is unlikely in this work. These results suggest why DHHB did not work as a photostabilizer on AVO singlet excited state. Phototoxicity results demonstrated that combinations containing DHHB (C2) did not show a phototoxic potential. Finally, although DHHB was considered to be photostable for all formulations studied (F2 and F3) it did not increase the photostability of AVO (F3). Thus, we suggested that formulations containing DHHB (F2) should be considered more advantageous than formulations containing AVO and AVO/DHHB (F1 and F3 respectively).
本研究的目的是调查二羟基二苯甲酰基苯甲酸(DHHB)的光化学行为及其在不同防晒配方中对阿伏苯宗(AVO)的光稳定作用。通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和分光光度法对这些配方进行光稳定性研究。使用3T3成纤维细胞培养物评估体外光毒性。通过稳态和时间分辨荧光光谱研究DHHB与AVO之间的相互作用机制。所有配方均提供了对UVA辐射的超防护。HPLC结果表明,DHHB对AVO没有光稳定作用。荧光光谱表明,AVO和DHHB通过静态猝灭机制相互作用,并且DHHB不影响AVO的激发态寿命。此外,在这项工作中,由Förster机制(FRET)进行的能量转移(这是导致单线态-单线态猝灭的最常见机制)不太可能发生。这些结果说明了为什么DHHB在AVO单线态激发态上不能作为光稳定剂起作用。光毒性结果表明,含有DHHB的组合(C2)没有显示出光毒性潜力。最后,尽管DHHB被认为对所有研究的配方(F2和F3)都是光稳定的,但它并没有提高AVO(F3)的光稳定性。因此,我们认为含有DHHB的配方(F2)比分别含有AVO和AVO/DHHB的配方(F1和F3)更具优势。