Deer Timothy R, Hayek Salim M, Pope Jason E, Lamer Tim J, Hamza Maged, Grider Jay S, Rosen Steven M, Narouze Samir, Perruchoud Christophe, Thomson Simon, Russo Marc, Grigsby Eric, Doleys Daniel M, Jacobs Marilyn S, Saulino Michael, Christo Paul, Kim Philip, Huntoon Elliot Marc, Krames Elliot, Mekhail Nagy
Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, WV, USA.
Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2017 Feb;20(2):133-154. doi: 10.1111/ner.12543. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
Intrathecal (IT) drug infusion is an appropriate and necessary tool in the algorithm to treat refractory cancer and noncancer pain. The decision-making steps/methodology for selecting appropriate patients for implanted targeted drug delivery systems is controversial and complicated. Therefore, a consensus on best practices for determining appropriate use of IT drug infusion may involve testing/trialing this therapy before implantation.
This current Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) update was designed to address the deficiencies and emerging innovations since the previous PACC convened in 2012. A literature search identified publications available since the previous PACC publications in 2014, and relevant sources were contributed by the PACC members. After reviewing the literature, the panel determined the evidence levels and degrees of recommendations. The developed consensus was ranked as strong (>80%), moderate (50-79%), or weak (<49%).
The trialing for IT drug delivery systems (IDDS) remains an area of continued controversy. The PACC recommendations for trialing are presented in 34 consensus points and cover trialing for morphine, ziconotide, and medication admixtures; starting doses and titration practices; measurements of success; trial settings and monitoring; management of systemic opioids during trialing; and the role of psychological evaluation. Finally, the PACC describes clinical scenarios in which IT trialing is required or not required.
The PACC provides consensus guidance on best practices of trialing for IDDS implants. In addition, the PACC recommends that no trial may be required in certain patient populations.
鞘内药物输注是治疗难治性癌症和非癌性疼痛的算法中一种合适且必要的工具。为植入式靶向给药系统选择合适患者的决策步骤/方法存在争议且复杂。因此,就确定鞘内药物输注的适当使用的最佳实践达成共识可能涉及在植入前对该疗法进行测试/试验。
本次多模式镇痛共识会议(PACC)更新旨在解决自2012年上次PACC召开以来的不足和新出现的创新。文献检索确定了自2014年上次PACC出版物以来可用的出版物,PACC成员提供了相关资料来源。在回顾文献后,小组确定了证据水平和推荐程度。制定的共识被评为强(>80%)、中(50-79%)或弱(<49%)。
鞘内给药系统(IDDS)的试验仍然是一个持续存在争议的领域。PACC关于试验的建议以34个共识点呈现,涵盖吗啡、齐考诺肽和药物混合物的试验;起始剂量和滴定方法;成功的衡量标准;试验设置和监测;试验期间全身性阿片类药物的管理;以及心理评估的作用。最后,PACC描述了需要或不需要进行鞘内试验的临床情况。
PACC为IDDS植入试验的最佳实践提供了共识指导。此外,PACC建议在某些患者群体中可能不需要进行试验。