Timmons Mark K, Yesilyaprak Sevgi S, Ericksen Jeff, Michener Lori A
School of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25703, USA.
Dokuz Eylul University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Inciralti Saglik Yerleskesi, Balcova, 35340 Izmir, Turkey.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Feb;42:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
The full can test is theorized to produce compressive loads on the supraspinatus tendon within the subacromial space. Characterizing the width of the subacromial outlet, scapular orientation, and shoulder pain during the full can test will improve the mechanistic understanding of the positive full can test.
Cross-sectional repeated measures design. Participants with subacromial pain syndrome (n=30) were compared to a matched control group (n=30) during 2 conditions: passive support, and the full can test. The full can test was performed with the arm elevated to 90° in the scapular plane. In both conditions, measurements were taken of acromiohumeral distance with ultrasonography, scapular position using electromagnetic tracking, shoulder strength using a dynamometer, and shoulder pain with the 11-point rating scale.
During the full can test, both groups had a decreased acromial humeral distance, scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, external rotation and clavicular protraction as compared to passive support (p<0.05). The subacromial pain group as compared to the control group reported greater shoulder pain (p<0.001), reduced strength (p=0.002) and greater scapular anterior tilt (p<0.05) during the full can test.
This study indicates the mechanisms of a full can test are a reduction in the acromial humeral distance, accompanied by scapular kinematic changes. A positive test of increased pain and reduced strength in those with subacromial pain syndrome can be explained additionally by an increase in scapular anterior tilt. These mechanistic changes may lead to tendon compression, but this cannot be verified as direct tendon compression was not measured.
理论上,全罐试验会在肩峰下间隙内的冈上肌腱上产生压缩负荷。在全罐试验过程中,对肩峰下出口的宽度、肩胛骨方向和肩部疼痛进行特征描述,将有助于提高对阳性全罐试验机制的理解。
采用横断面重复测量设计。将肩峰下疼痛综合征患者(n = 30)与匹配的对照组(n = 30)在两种情况下进行比较:被动支撑和全罐试验。全罐试验时,手臂在肩胛骨平面内抬高至90°。在两种情况下,均使用超声测量肩峰下间隙距离,使用电磁跟踪测量肩胛骨位置,使用测力计测量肩部力量,并使用11点疼痛评分量表评估肩部疼痛。
在全罐试验期间,与被动支撑相比,两组的肩峰下间隙距离均减小,肩胛骨出现向上旋转、后倾、外旋和锁骨前突(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,肩峰下疼痛组在全罐试验期间报告的肩部疼痛更严重(p < 0.001),力量降低(p = 0.002),肩胛骨前倾更大(p < 0.05)。
本研究表明,全罐试验的机制是肩峰下间隙距离减小,并伴有肩胛骨运动学变化。肩峰下疼痛综合征患者疼痛增加和力量降低的阳性试验结果,可另外用肩胛骨前倾增加来解释。这些机制变化可能导致肌腱受压,但由于未测量直接的肌腱受压情况,无法得到证实。