Ji Y Q, Li S, Wang C, Wang J, Liu X M
National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 20;34(10):737-741. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2016.10.004.
To investigate occupational stress in assembly line workers in electronics manu-facturing service (EMS) and related influencing factors. From June to October, 2015, a cross-sectional survey was performed for 5 944 assembly line workers in EMS (observation group) and 6 270 workers from other posts (non-assembly line workers and management personnel; control group) using the self-made questionnaire for basic information, job demand-control (JDC) model questionnaire, and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model questionnaire to collect respondents' basic information and occupational stress. The observation group had significantly lower work autonomy, social support, and work reward scores than the control group (2.72 ± 0.63/3.64 ± 0.68/4.06 ± 0.80 3.00 ± 0.67/3.83 ± 0.68/4.24 ± 0.75, =23.53, 15.41, and 12.70, all <0.05) , as well as significantly higher work effort and job involvement scores than the control group (2.34±0.78/2.48±0.78 2.21±0.80/2.33±0.77, =-9.08 and-10.90, both <0.05). The observation group had significantly higher proportions of workers with occupational stress determined by JDC and ERI models than the control group (64.5%/12.7% 52.6%/9.9%, χ=182.26 and 23.41, both <0.05). Female sex, migrant workers, working time >60 hours/week, and sleeping time <7 hours/day were major risk factors for occupational stress in JDC model; education background of Bachelor's degree or above, working time >60 hours/week, and sleeping time<7 hours/day were major risk factors for occupational stress in ERI model, while female sex and a high monthly income reduced the risk of occupational stress in ERI model. Assembly line workers in EMS are a relatively vulnerable group and have a high degree of occupational stress. Working time >60 hours/week and sleeping time <7 hours/day are major risk factors for occupational stress.
调查电子制造服务(EMS)行业装配线工人的职业压力及其相关影响因素。2015年6月至10月,采用自制的基本信息问卷、工作需求-控制(JDC)模型问卷和努力-回报失衡(ERI)模型问卷,对5944名EMS装配线工人(观察组)和6270名其他岗位工人(非装配线工人和管理人员;对照组)进行横断面调查,以收集受访者的基本信息和职业压力情况。观察组的工作自主性、社会支持和工作回报得分显著低于对照组(2.72±0.63/3.64±0.68/4.06±0.80 对 3.00±0.67/3.83±0.68/4.24±0.75,F=23.53、15.41和12.70,均<0.05),工作努力和工作投入得分显著高于对照组(2.34±0.78/2.48±0.78 对 2.21±0.80/2.33±0.77,t=-9.08和-10.90,均<0.05)。观察组中根据JDC和ERI模型判定有职业压力的工人比例显著高于对照组(64.5%/12.7% 对 52.6%/9.9%,χ²=182.26和23.41,均<0.05)。女性、农民工、每周工作时间>60小时以及每天睡眠时间<7小时是JDC模型中职业压力的主要危险因素;本科及以上学历、每周工作时间>60小时以及每天睡眠时间<7小时是ERI模型中职业压力的主要危险因素,而女性和月收入高则降低了ERI模型中职业压力的风险。EMS行业的装配线工人是一个相对脆弱的群体,职业压力程度较高。每周工作时间>60小时和每天睡眠时间<7小时是职业压力的主要危险因素。