• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对用于分枝杆菌培养的工藤方法的评估:冈比亚的经验。

Evaluation of the Kudoh method for mycobacterial culture: Gambia experience.

作者信息

Jobarteh Tijan, Otu Jacob, Gitteh Ensa, Mendy Francis, Faal-Jawara Tutty I, Ofori-Anyinam Boatema, Ayorinde Abigail, Secka Ousman, Antonio Martin, Gehre Florian

机构信息

Medical Research Council Unit, Gambia.

Medical Research Council Unit, Gambia.

出版信息

Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.09.049. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.09.049
PMID:28043531
Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To evaluate the Kudoh swab method for improving laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in Gambia.

METHODS

A total of 75 sputa (50 smear positive and 25 smear negative) were examined. Sputum samples were collected from leftover routine samples from the Medical Research Council Unit, Gambia TB Diagnostic Laboratory. The samples were processed using the standard N-acetyl-l-cysteine-NaOH (NALC-NaOH) methods currently used and Kudoh swab method. These were cultured on standard Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) and Modified Ogawa media, respectively, and incubated aerobically at 36±1°C for mycobacterial growth. To determine if the decontamination and culture methods compared could equally detect the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) highly commonly isolated in Gambia, spoligotyping was done.

RESULTS

In total, 72% (54/75) of MTBC were recovered by both LJ and Modified Ogawa methods. The LJ method recovered 52% (39/75) and Modified Ogawa recovered 56% (42/75) of the MTBC, respectively. Spoligotyping showed Euro-American 35% (19/54), Indo-Oceanic 35% (19/54), Mycobacterium africanum (West African type 2) 26% (14/54), Beijing 2% (1/54), and M. africanum (West African type 1) 2% (1/54).

CONCLUSION

The Kudoh method is simpler and cheaper than the NALC-NaOH method. There was no significant difference in recovery between the methods. The Kudoh method is ideal in overburdened TB laboratories with poor resources in developing countries. The predominant lineages were Euro-American and Indo-Oceanic, followed by M. africanum (West African type 2).

摘要

目的/背景:评估久道拭子法对改善冈比亚结核病实验室诊断的效果。

方法

共检测了75份痰液样本(50份涂片阳性和25份涂片阴性)。痰液样本取自冈比亚结核病诊断实验室医学研究理事会部门剩余的常规样本。样本分别采用目前使用的标准N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸-氢氧化钠(NALC-NaOH)方法和久道拭子法进行处理。这些样本分别接种于标准罗-琴(LJ)培养基和改良小川培养基上,在36±1°C有氧条件下培养以促进分枝杆菌生长。为确定所比较的去污和培养方法能否同样检测出冈比亚常见的结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTBC),进行了间隔寡核苷酸分型。

结果

LJ培养基法和改良小川培养基法总共培养出72%(54/75)的MTBC。LJ培养基法培养出52%(39/75)的MTBC,改良小川培养基法培养出56%(42/75)的MTBC。间隔寡核苷酸分型显示欧美型占35%(19/54),印度洋型占35%(19/54),非洲分枝杆菌(西非2型)占26%(14/54),北京型占2%(1/54),非洲分枝杆菌(西非1型)占2%(1/54)。

结论

久道拭子法比NALC-NaOH法更简便、成本更低。两种方法在培养成功率上无显著差异。久道拭子法对于发展中国家资源匮乏、负担过重的结核病实验室而言是理想的方法。主要菌系为欧美型和印度洋型,其次是非洲分枝杆菌(西非2型)。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Kudoh method for mycobacterial culture: Gambia experience.对用于分枝杆菌培养的工藤方法的评估:冈比亚的经验。
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.09.049. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
The use of Kudoh method for culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium africanum in The Gambia.冈比亚使用古藤法培养结核分枝杆菌和非洲分枝杆菌。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0300042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300042. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of sodium hydroxide-N-acetyl-l-cysteine and 0.7% chlorhexidine decontamination methods for recovering Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum samples: A comparative analysis (The Gambia Experience).评估用于从痰液样本中回收结核分枝杆菌的氢氧化钠-N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸和0.7%氯己定去污方法:一项比较分析(冈比亚经验)
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S167-S168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
Performance of the Ogawa-Kudoh method for isolation of mycobacteria in a laboratory with large-scale workload.小川-工藤方法在大规模工作量实验室中用于分离分枝杆菌的性能。
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;42(2):87-90. doi: 10.1590/S0325-75412010000200003.
5
Fast, Simple, and Cheap: the Kudoh-Ogawa Swab Method as an Alternative to the Petroff-Lowenstein-Jensen Method for Culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.快速、简便且经济:久藤-小川拭子法作为结核分枝杆菌培养的彼得罗夫-洛温斯坦-延森法的替代方法
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01424-19.
6
Evaluation of the Ogawa-Kudoh method for tuberculosis isolation in two health units in Mozambique.对莫桑比克两个卫生单位采用小川-工藤法进行结核分枝杆菌分离培养的评估。
Afr J Lab Med. 2020 Jul 20;9(1):929. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.929. eCollection 2020.
7
Contribution of the Ogawa-Kudoh swab culture method to the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazil.奥加瓦-工藤拭子培养法对巴西肺结核病诊断的贡献。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Jun;17(6):782-6. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0500.
8
Comparison of complex Yield and Contamination Rates using Lowenstein-Jensen with and without Antibiotics in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部使用含抗生素和不含抗生素的罗-琴培养基对复合产率和污染率的比较
J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;5(8). doi: 10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.86.
9
Genotypic characterization directly applied to sputum improves the detection of Mycobacterium africanum West African 1, under-represented in positive cultures.直接应用于痰液的基因分型特征分析可提高非洲分枝杆菌西非1型的检测率,该菌在阳性培养物中代表性不足。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 1;11(9):e0005900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005900. eCollection 2017 Sep.
10
[Comparison and evaluation of Lowenstein-Jensen medium and 2% Ogawa medium for the diagnosis of tuberculosis].[用于结核病诊断的罗氏培养基与2%小川培养基的比较与评价]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012 Jan;46(1):33-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Fast, Simple, and Cheap: the Kudoh-Ogawa Swab Method as an Alternative to the Petroff-Lowenstein-Jensen Method for Culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.快速、简便且经济:久藤-小川拭子法作为结核分枝杆菌培养的彼得罗夫-洛温斯坦-延森法的替代方法
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01424-19.
2
Comparison between Ogawa-Kudoh and modified Petroff techniques for mycobacteria cultivation in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.小川-工藤法与改良彼得罗夫法在肺结核诊断中培养分枝杆菌的比较。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018 Jun 11;16(2):eAO4214. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082018AO4214.