Suppr超能文献

快速、简便且经济:久藤-小川拭子法作为结核分枝杆菌培养的彼得罗夫-洛温斯坦-延森法的替代方法

Fast, Simple, and Cheap: the Kudoh-Ogawa Swab Method as an Alternative to the Petroff-Lowenstein-Jensen Method for Culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

作者信息

Franco-Sotomayor Greta, Rivera-Olivero Ismar A, Leon-Benitez Margarita, Uruchima-Campoverde Sandra E, Cardenas-Franco Greta, Perdomo-Castro Mercedes E, Cardenas-Franco Camilo S, Ortega-Vivanco Jackeline, Abad-Ruiz Ana S, de Waard Jacobus H, Garcia-Bereguiain Miguel Angel

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública e Investigación Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01424-19.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of the Kudoh-Ogawa (K-O) swab method for the culturing of from clinical samples with the standard Petroff-Lowenstein-Jensen (P-LJ) procedure. A total of 2,287 sputum samples and 685 extrapulmonary clinical specimens were processed with both decontamination methods and compared for detection rate, recovery of colonies, and culture contamination. Overall, 23.9% and 23.5% of the samples, processed with, respectively, the K-O swab method and the P-LJ procedure, yielded after 8 weeks of incubation. The K-O swab method and the P-LJ procedure provided comparable diagnostic yields for extrapulmonary clinical specimens ( = 0.688), but the K-O method showed a slightly but statistically significantly higher diagnostic yield for pulmonary samples ( = 0.002). No significant difference for culture contamination or colony recovery was found for either method. The turnaround time for the isolation of was significantly shorter for the K-O swab method, with 77% of the cultures being positive within 3 weeks of incubation, and only 6.1% positivity for the P-LJ method. Concerning the workload, the K-O swab method needs a minimum sample manipulation and takes less than 4 min per sample, as the samples are not centrifuged in this procedure. The K-O swab method is an efficient and fast (in terms of sample processing and culture growth) alternative for culturing from either pulmonary or extrapulmonary clinical specimens. The method is particularly suitable for laboratories with a high workload and for laboratories lacking a special infrastructure.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较久藤-小川(K-O)拭子法从临床样本中培养结核菌的诊断率与标准的彼得罗夫-洛文斯坦-延森(P-LJ)方法。总共2287份痰标本和685份肺外临床标本采用两种去污方法进行处理,并比较结核菌的检测率、菌落回收率和培养污染情况。总体而言,分别采用K-O拭子法和P-LJ方法处理的样本中,23.9%和23.5%在培养8周后培养出结核菌。K-O拭子法和P-LJ方法对肺外临床标本的诊断率相当(P = 0.688),但K-O方法对肺部样本的诊断率略高且具有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。两种方法在培养污染或菌落回收率方面均未发现显著差异。K-O拭子法分离结核菌的周转时间明显更短,77%的结核菌培养物在培养3周内呈阳性,而P-LJ方法的阳性率仅为6.1%。关于工作量,K-O拭子法所需的样本操作最少,每个样本处理时间不到4分钟,因为在此过程中样本无需离心。K-O拭子法是从肺部或肺外临床标本中培养结核菌的一种高效且快速(在样本处理和培养生长方面)的替代方法。该方法特别适用于工作量大的实验室以及缺乏特殊基础设施的实验室。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验