Marado L M, Silva A M, Irish J D
Unit of Archaeology, University of Minho, Portugal; Lab2PT - Landscape, Heritage and Territory Laboratory, University of Minho, Portugal.
Prehistory Laboratory, CIAS, University of Coimbra, Portugal; UNIARQ - WAPS, University of Lisbon Archaeology Center, Portugal; Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, Center for Functional Ecology, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Homo. 2017 Jan;68(1):18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Fluctuating asymmetry, often considered a measure of developmental instability, was studied in the dental morphological traits of 600 individuals from among the poorest sectors of society in 19th-20th century Portugal. The aims are to identify and interpret any differences between: (1) males and females, and (2) patterns of distribution among teeth with different odontogenic timings, to assess if any sex bias existed in childcare. Dental and mandibular morphological traits were recorded using the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System. z-Ratios were used to compare summed absolute fluctuating asymmetry frequencies between sexes and age groups. Results from rank correlation coefficients ruled out directional asymmetry and antisymmetry, based on positive (>0.2) bilateral association of traits in larger samples. Sex differences were significant (z-ratio=3.128; p=0.0018), while age differences were not (z-ratio=-0.644; p=0.5196). Teeth forming after infancy tended to be more asymmetric in females. Potential reasons for the sex difference include: (1) greater female susceptibility to developmental instability, (2) greater male childhood mortality that yields lower fluctuating asymmetry in surviving males, and/or (3) cultural bias favoring male access to resources. Results suggest the latter hypothesis is most likely, as fluctuating asymmetry is enhanced during childhood, perhaps coinciding with gender role definitions. There seems to be no association between asymmetry and early mortality in males. A lack of parallels in prior research renders differential sex reaction to environmental stress dubious. This population may have favored male children in their access to appropriate conditions for development.
波动不对称性通常被视为发育不稳定性的一种度量,本研究针对19至20世纪葡萄牙社会最贫困阶层的600名个体的牙齿形态特征进行了研究。目的是识别并解释以下两者之间的差异:(1)男性和女性之间;(2)不同牙源性发育时间的牙齿分布模式之间,以评估在儿童保育方面是否存在性别偏见。使用亚利桑那州立大学牙齿人类学系统记录牙齿和下颌形态特征。z比率用于比较性别和年龄组之间绝对波动不对称频率的总和。秩相关系数的结果排除了方向不对称性和反对称性,这是基于更大样本中特征的正向(>0.2)双侧关联得出的。性别差异显著(z比率=3.128;p=0.0018),而年龄差异不显著(z比率=-0.644;p=0.5196)。婴儿期后形成的牙齿在女性中往往更不对称。性别差异的潜在原因包括:(1)女性对发育不稳定性的易感性更高;(2)男性儿童死亡率更高,导致存活男性的波动不对称性更低;和/或(3)文化偏见有利于男性获取资源。结果表明后一种假设最有可能,因为波动不对称性在儿童期会增强,可能与性别角色定义同时发生。男性的不对称性与早期死亡率之间似乎没有关联。先前研究缺乏相似之处,使得性别对环境压力的不同反应存疑。这个群体可能在为男性儿童提供适宜发育条件方面更具偏向性。