Suppr超能文献

机器人手术与腹式子宫切除术的代谢和炎症反应及后续恢复:一项随机对照研究。

Metabolic and inflammatory responses and subsequent recovery in robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden; School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden.

School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;37(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surgery causes inflammatory and metabolic responses in the body. The aim of the study was to investigate whether robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy induces less insulin resistance than abdominal hysterectomy, and to compare inflammatory response and clinical recovery between the two techniques.

METHODS

A randomised controlled study at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden. Twenty women scheduled for a planned total hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy between October 2014 and May 2015, were randomly allocated to robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. Insulin resistance after surgery was measured by the hyperinsulinemic normoglycaemic clamp method, inflammatory response measured in blood samples, and clinical recovery outcomes registered.

RESULTS

There were no differences in development of insulin resistance between the robotic group and the abdominal group (mean ± SD: 39% ± 22 vs. 40% ± 19; p = 0.948). The robotic group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (median 1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.005). Inflammatory reaction differed; in comparison to the robotic group, the abdominal group showed significantly higher increases in serum interleukin 6 levels, white blood cell count and cortisol from preoperative values to postoperative peak values.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic laparoscopic surgery reduced inflammatory responses and recovery time, but these changes were not accompanied by decreased insulin resistance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier no NCT02291406.

摘要

背景与目的

手术会引起机体的炎症和代谢反应。本研究旨在探讨机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术是否比开腹子宫切除术引起的胰岛素抵抗更小,并比较两种技术的炎症反应和临床恢复情况。

方法

这是在瑞典厄勒布鲁大学医院妇产科进行的一项随机对照研究。2014 年 10 月至 2015 年 5 月期间,20 名计划行全子宫切除术(伴或不伴输卵管卵巢切除术)的女性被随机分配至机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术或开腹子宫切除术组。术后通过高胰岛素正葡萄糖钳夹法测量胰岛素抵抗,检测血样中的炎症反应,并登记临床恢复结果。

结果

机器人组和开腹组之间胰岛素抵抗的发展无差异(平均±标准差:39%±22 与 40%±19;p=0.948)。机器人组的住院时间明显更短(中位数 1 天与 2 天;p=0.005)。炎症反应不同;与机器人组相比,开腹组的血清白细胞介素 6 水平、白细胞计数和皮质醇从术前值到术后峰值的升高显著更高。

结论

机器人腹腔镜手术减少了炎症反应和恢复时间,但这些变化并没有伴随着胰岛素抵抗的降低。

临床试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT02291406。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验