Suppr超能文献

良性微创子宫切除术的非阿片类镇痛药管理:系统评价。

Non-opioid pain management in benign minimally invasive hysterectomy: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Graduate Medical Education, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL; Division of Surgery, Gynecology Section, Orlando Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

Division of Surgery, Gynecology Section, Orlando Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):557-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.175. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Less postoperative pain typically is associated with a minimally invasive hysterectomy compared with a laparotomy approach; however, poor pain control can still be an issue. Multiple guidelines exist for managing postoperative pain, yet most are not specialty-specific and are based on procedures that bear little relevance to a minimally invasive hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is enough quality evidence within the benign gynecology literature to make non-opioid pain control recommendations for women who undergo a benign minimally invasive hysterectomy.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We queried PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases using MeSH terms: "postoperative pain," "perioperative pain," "postoperative analgesia," "pain management," "pain control," "minimally invasive gynecologic surgery," and "hysterectomy." A manual examination of references from identified studies was also performed. All PubMed published studies that involved minimally invasive hysterectomies through November 9, 2016, were included. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were restricted to benign minimally invasive hysterectomies evaluating non-opioid pharmacologic therapies. Primary outcomes included amount of postoperative analgesics consumed and postoperative pain scores. Two reviewers independently completed an in-depth evaluation of each study for characteristics and results using an established database, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. A risk assessment was performed, and a quality rating was assigned with the use of the Cochrane Collaboration's Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Initially 1155 studies were identified, and 24 studies met all inclusion criteria. Based on limited data of varying quality, intravenous acetaminophen, anticonvulsants and dexamethasone demonstrate opioid-sparing benefits; ketorolac shows mixed results in laparoscopic hysterectomies. Paracervical blocks provide pain-reducing benefits in vaginal hysterectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. There is a clear need for more high-quality research that will evaluate each medication type for posthysterectomy pain control.

摘要

背景

与剖腹手术相比,微创子宫切除术通常与较少的术后疼痛相关;然而,疼痛控制不佳仍然是一个问题。有许多管理术后疼痛的指南,但大多数都不是专业特定的,并且基于与微创子宫切除术相关性不大的程序。

目的

本研究的目的是确定良性妇科文献中是否有足够的高质量证据,为接受良性微创子宫切除术的女性提供非阿片类药物控制疼痛的建议。

研究评估和综合方法

我们使用 MeSH 术语在 PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行查询:“术后疼痛”、“围手术期疼痛”、“术后镇痛”、“疼痛管理”、“疼痛控制”、“微创妇科手术”和“子宫切除术”。还对确定研究的参考文献进行了手动检查。所有涉及微创子宫切除术的 PubMed 已发表研究均纳入研究。本系统评价根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。研究仅限于评估非阿片类药物治疗的良性微创子宫切除术。主要结果包括术后镇痛药的消耗量和术后疼痛评分。两名评审员独立使用既定数据库根据纳入/排除标准对每项研究的特征和结果进行深入评估。进行风险评估,并使用 Cochrane 协作组的推荐、评估、开发和评估方法进行质量评级。

结果

最初确定了 1155 项研究,24 项研究符合所有纳入标准。基于不同质量的有限数据,静脉内对乙酰氨基酚、抗惊厥药和地塞米松显示出阿片类药物节约的益处;酮咯酸在腹腔镜子宫切除术中有混合结果。子宫旁阻滞在阴道子宫切除术中有减轻疼痛的益处。

结论

由于文献的异质性和矛盾性质,很难得出令人信服的结论。显然需要更多高质量的研究来评估每种药物类型对子宫切除术后疼痛控制的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验