• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, PR China.

Department of Scientific Bureau, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, 050051, PR China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.122. Epub 2016 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.122
PMID:28043927
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No formal systematic review or meta-analysis was performed up to now to summarize the risk factors of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty(THA).

AIMS

The present study aimed to quantitatively and comprehensively conclude the risk factors of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A search was applied to CNKI, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane central database (all up to October 2016). All studies assessing the risk factors of dislocation after revision THA without language restriction were reviewed, and qualities of included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were pooled and a meta-analysis completed.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies were selected, which altogether included 4656 revision THAs. 421 of them were cases of dislocation occurred after surgery, suggesting the accumulated incidence of 9.04%. Results of meta-analyses showed that age at surgery (standardized mean difference -0.222; 95% CI -0.413-0.031), small-diameter femoral heads (≤28 mm) (OR 1.451; 95%CI 1.056-1.994), history of instability (OR 2.739; 95%CI 1.888-3.974), number of prior revisions ≥ 3 (OR, 2.226; 95% CI, 1.569-3.16) and number of prior revisions ≥ 2 (OR 1.949; 95% CI 1.349-2.817), acetabular components with elevated rim liner were less likely to develop dislocation after revision THA (OR 0.611; 95% CI 0.415-0.898).

CONCLUSIONS

Related prophylaxis strategies should be implemented in patients involved with above-mentioned risk factors to prevent dislocation after revision THA.

摘要

背景

目前尚无正式的系统评价或荟萃分析来总结翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素。

目的

本研究旨在定量和全面地总结翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素。

方法

检索中国知网、Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane 中心数据库(均截至 2016 年 10 月),纳入所有评估翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位危险因素的研究,采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评价纳入研究的质量。对数据进行汇总并完成荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 8 项研究,共 4656 例翻修全髋关节置换术。其中 421 例术后发生脱位,累积发生率为 9.04%。荟萃分析结果显示,手术时年龄(标准化均数差-0.222;95%可信区间-0.413~0.031)、小直径股骨头(≤28 mm)(比值比 1.451;95%可信区间 1.056~1.994)、既往不稳定史(比值比 2.739;95%可信区间 1.888~3.974)、翻修次数≥3 次(比值比 2.226;95%可信区间 1.569~3.16)和翻修次数≥2 次(比值比 1.949;95%可信区间 1.349~2.817)、髋臼侧使用高边内衬的假体更不易发生翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位(比值比 0.611;95%可信区间 0.415~0.898)。

结论

对于具有上述危险因素的患者,应采取相关预防策略,以预防翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.122. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
2
Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.单动、双动及大股骨头全髋关节置换术的翻修及脱位风险:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2073-y. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
3
Risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者髋部骨折修复术后谵妄的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;29(2):115-126. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0541-6. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review.使用双动髋臼组件的全髋关节置换术后脱位:一项系统评价
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1.
5
Use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.在初次全髋关节置换术中使用高衬垫:文献系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 May;32(4):587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03023-y. Epub 2021 May 29.
6
Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.全髋关节置换术中双动组件的疗效:文献系统评价
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
7
Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多孔金属与非多孔金属髋臼部件在髋臼翻修术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Apr;100:106597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106597. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
Is operative revision associated with favourable clinical outcomes in arthrofibrosis following total hip arthroplasty (THA)? A retrospective, single-centre data analysis of forty two cases.全髋关节置换术(THA)后关节纤维化的手术翻修是否与良好的临床结果相关?一项对42例病例的回顾性单中心数据分析。
Int Orthop. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06533-0.
9
Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.成人髋部骨折的关节成形术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013410. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013410.pub2.
10
Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion is Associated With an Increased Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.先前的腰椎融合术与全髋关节置换术后脱位和翻修的风险增加相关:一项荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of patients showing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort study.急性护理医院中全髋关节置换术后出现脱位的患者特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42664. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042664.
2
Dislocation incidence and risk factors following direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty: a consecutive, single-surgeon cohort.直接前路初次全髋关节置换术后的脱位发生率及危险因素:一项连续的单术者队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 5;26(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08683-z.
3
Approach to the patient with controlled acromegaly and acromegalic arthropathy: clinical diagnosis and management.
控制期肢端肥大症和肢端肥大症性关节病患者的诊疗方法:临床诊断与管理
Pituitary. 2024 Dec;27(6):824-836. doi: 10.1007/s11102-024-01465-1. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
4
Management of hip osteoarthritis: harnessing the potential of mesenchymal stem cells-a systematic review.髋关节骨关节炎的管理:利用间充质干细胞的潜力——系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3847-3857. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04089-0. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Short-term primary and revision modular dual-mobility cup total hip arthroplasty outcomes in high-risk dislocation patients: a retrospective study.短期原发和翻修模块化双动杯全髋关节置换术在高脱位风险患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3981-3988. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04092-5. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
6
[Medium- and long-term effectiveness of hip revision with SL-PLUS MIA stem in patients with Paprosky type - femoral bone defect].[SL-PLUS MIA柄用于Paprosky分型股骨骨缺损患者髋关节翻修术的中长期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):842-848. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403053.
7
Revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture: epidemiology, outcomes, and factors associated with success.人工关节周围骨折的翻修全髋关节置换术:流行病学、结果及与成功相关的因素。
Ann Jt. 2023 Jul 10;8:30. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-16. eCollection 2023.
8
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hip Revision Surgery and Cerclage Wires Fixation for Vancouver B2 and B3 Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.髋关节翻修手术及环扎钢丝固定治疗温哥华B2和B3型骨折的临床及影像学结果:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 3;13(3):892. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030892.
9
Defining the optimal position of the lipped liner in combination with cup orientation and stem version.结合髋臼杯方向和柄部外翻角度确定带唇缘内衬的最佳位置。
Bone Joint Res. 2023 Sep 20;12(9):571-579. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.129.BJR-2022-0471.R1.
10
Risk Factors for Dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.髋关节发育不良行全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2023 Dec;47(12):3063-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05949-w. Epub 2023 Sep 9.