• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力与决策:对估值、学习和冒险行为的影响。

Stress and Decision Making: Effects on Valuation, Learning, and Risk-taking.

作者信息

Porcelli Anthony J, Delgado Mauricio R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Marquette University, PO, BOX 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 101 Warren Street, Smith Hall -Room 340, Newark, NJ 07102.

出版信息

Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Apr;14:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015
PMID:28044144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5201132/
Abstract

A wide range of stressful experiences can influence human decision making in complex ways beyond the simple predictions of a fight-or-flight model. Recent advances may provide insight into this complicated interaction, potentially in directions that could result in translational applications. Early research suggests that stress exposure influences basic neural circuits involved in reward processing and learning, while also biasing decisions towards habit and modulating our propensity to engage in risk-taking. That said, a substantial array of theoretical and methodological considerations in research on the topic challenge strong cross study comparisons necessary for the field to move forward. In this review we examine the multifaceted stress construct in the context of human decision making, emphasizing stress' effect on valuation, learning, and risk-taking.

摘要

各种各样的压力经历会以复杂的方式影响人类决策,而不仅仅是简单的“战斗或逃跑”模型所能预测的。最近的进展可能有助于深入了解这种复杂的相互作用,有可能朝着可转化应用的方向发展。早期研究表明,接触压力会影响参与奖励处理和学习的基本神经回路,同时还会使决策偏向习惯,并调节我们参与冒险行为的倾向。话虽如此,该主题研究中的大量理论和方法考量对该领域取得进展所需的强有力的跨研究比较提出了挑战。在本综述中,我们在人类决策的背景下审视多方面的压力结构,重点强调压力对估值、学习和冒险行为的影响。

相似文献

1
Stress and Decision Making: Effects on Valuation, Learning, and Risk-taking.压力与决策:对估值、学习和冒险行为的影响。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Apr;14:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015.
2
Acute stress influences neural circuits of reward processing.急性应激影响奖赏加工的神经回路。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Nov 1;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00157. eCollection 2012.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Reactivation of Reward-Related Patterns from Single Past Episodes Supports Memory-Based Decision Making.来自单个过往事件的奖励相关模式的重新激活支持基于记忆的决策。
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 9;36(10):2868-80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3433-15.2016.
6
How Accumulated Real Life Stress Experience and Cognitive Speed Interact on Decision-Making Processes.累积的现实生活压力体验与认知速度如何在决策过程中相互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 8;11:302. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00302. eCollection 2017.
7
Imaging valuation models in human choice.人类选择中的成像评估模型。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:417-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112903.
8
Asymmetric effects of acute stress on cost and benefit learning.急性应激对成本与收益学习的不对称影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Apr;138:105646. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105646. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
Congruence of Inherent and Acquired Values Facilitates Reward-Based Decision-Making.内在价值观与后天习得价值观的一致性有助于基于奖励的决策。
J Neurosci. 2016 May 4;36(18):5003-12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3084-15.2016.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-medication among university students in Guangdong province, China: a cross-sectional study using the KAP model.中国广东省大学生的自我药疗:一项采用KAP模型的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;13:1601731. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601731. eCollection 2025.
2
Stress, Health, and Injury Among Illinois Farmers.伊利诺伊州农民的压力、健康与伤害
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Sep;68(9):761-771. doi: 10.1002/ajim.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
3
Stress awareness and decision-making under uncertainty: Gender-specific effects of mild hypoxia in the Iowa Gambling Task.压力意识与不确定性下的决策:低氧环境对爱荷华赌博任务中性别差异的影响
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01320-1.
4
A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Hot and Cool Executive Functions in Reward and Competition.一项关于奖励与竞争中热执行功能和冷执行功能的功能磁共振成像研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;25(3):806. doi: 10.3390/s25030806.
5
Chronic social instability stress differentially affects the behavior and the transcriptome of the anterodorsal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis between male and female mice.慢性社会不稳定应激对雄性和雌性小鼠终纹床核前背侧的行为和转录组有不同影响。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 21:2025.01.21.634142. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.21.634142.
6
How childhood adversity affects components of decision making.童年逆境如何影响决策的各个组成部分。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Feb;169:106027. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106027. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
7
Late-life psychiatric factors and life satisfaction are associated with cognitive errors: evidence from an experimental module of a large-scale survey in India.晚年精神因素和生活满意度与认知错误有关:来自印度大规模调查实验模块的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76180-9.
8
Model-free decision-making underlies motor errors in rapid sequential movements under threat.在威胁下快速连续运动中的运动错误背后存在无模型决策。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;2(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00123-3.
9
Effects of acute stress on reward processing: A comprehensive meta-analysis of rodent and human studies.急性应激对奖赏加工的影响:啮齿动物和人类研究的综合荟萃分析。
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 May 24;31:100647. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100647. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
No effects of acute stress on monetary delay discounting: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.急性应激对货币延迟折扣无影响:一项系统的文献综述与荟萃分析。
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Jun 3;31:100653. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100653. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The good, the bad and the brain: Neural correlates of appetitive and aversive values underlying decision making.善、恶与大脑:决策背后奖赏性与惩罚性价值的神经关联
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Oct;5:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
2
Acute stress does not affect risky monetary decision-making.急性应激不影响有风险的货币决策。
Neurobiol Stress. 2016 Nov 2;5:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.10.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Acute stress increases risky decisions and dampens prefrontal activation among adolescent boys.急性应激会增加青少年男性的冒险决策,并抑制前额叶的激活。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:679-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.067. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Acute stress alters individual risk taking in a time-dependent manner and leads to anti-social risk.急性应激以时间依赖的方式改变个体的冒险行为,并导致反社会风险。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Apr;45(7):877-885. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13395. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Stress and the adolescent brain: Amygdala-prefrontal cortex circuitry and ventral striatum as developmental targets.压力与青少年大脑:杏仁核-前额叶皮质神经回路及腹侧纹状体作为发育靶点
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Nov;70:217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.压力对不确定性下决策的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):909-933. doi: 10.1037/bul0000060.
7
Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions.通过皮质纹状体相互作用编码不同的奖励属性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 2;6:20093. doi: 10.1038/srep20093.
8
Cognitive Adaptation under Stress: A Case for the Mineralocorticoid Receptor.应激下的认知适应:以盐皮质激素受体为例。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;20(3):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
Perceived control alters the effect of acute stress on persistence.感知到的控制会改变急性应激对坚持性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):356-365. doi: 10.1037/xge0000137. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
10
The Effects of Social Context and Acute Stress on Decision Making Under Uncertainty.社会环境和急性应激对不确定性下决策的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Dec;26(12):1918-26. doi: 10.1177/0956797615605807. Epub 2015 Nov 5.