• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通肝素与比伐卢定在初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的比较:一项 SWEDEHEART 研究。

Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a SWEDEHEART study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Mar 20;12(16):2009-2017. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00884.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00884
PMID:28044990
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare outcomes in unfractionated heparin (UFH) and bivalirudin-treated patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This observational study contained 20,612 PPCI patients treated with either UFH monotherapy or bivalirudin with or without concomitant UFH. Patients with oral anticoagulant or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) treatment were excluded. The primary outcome measure was definite early stent thrombosis (ST) that occurred at low and similar rates in UFH only and bivalirudin-treated patients: 0.9% vs. 0.8% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-1.65). All-cause death at 30 days occurred in 6.9% vs. 5.4% of patients (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05-1.44) and within 365 days in 12.1% vs. 8.9% (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.19-1.52) in the two groups, respectively. The incidence of major bleeding within 30 days was 0.8% vs. 0.6% (adjusted HR 1.54, 95% CI: 0.97-2.45). The incidence of reinfarction within 365 days and stroke within 30 days was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, nationwide observational study we found low and similar rates of early ST in UFH only and bivalirudin-treated patients undergoing primary PCI. Mortality was higher in UFH compared with bivalirudin-treated patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较未分级肝素(UFH)和比伐卢定治疗行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的患者的结局。

方法和结果

本观察性研究纳入 20612 例行 PPCI 治疗的患者,其中接受 UFH 单药治疗或比伐卢定治疗,或 UFH 联合比伐卢定治疗。排除接受口服抗凝药或糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂(GPI)治疗的患者。主要结局测量指标为低且相似的 UFH 单药治疗和比伐卢定治疗患者的明确早期支架血栓形成(ST)发生率:0.9%比 0.8%(校正后危险比 [HR] 1.08,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.7-1.65)。30 天全因死亡率分别为 6.9%和 5.4%(校正后 HR 1.23,95%CI:1.05-1.44),365 天全因死亡率分别为 12.1%和 8.9%(校正后 HR 1.34,95%CI:1.19-1.52)。两组患者 30 天内大出血发生率分别为 0.8%和 0.6%(校正后 HR 1.54,95%CI:0.97-2.45)。两组患者 365 天内再梗死发生率和 30 天内卒中发生率相似。

结论

在这项大型全国性观察性研究中,我们发现 UFH 单药治疗和比伐卢定治疗行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者早期 ST 发生率较低且相似。与比伐卢定治疗的患者相比,UFH 治疗的患者死亡率更高。

相似文献

1
Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a SWEDEHEART study.普通肝素与比伐卢定在初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的比较:一项 SWEDEHEART 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Mar 20;12(16):2009-2017. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00884.
2
Comparison of bivalirudin with heparin versus abciximab with heparin for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in "Real World" practice.在“真实世界”实践中,比伐卢定与肝素联用对比阿昔单抗与肝素联用用于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
3
Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的抗凝治疗:支架和P2Y12抑制剂时代随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2014 Nov 11;349:g6419. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6419.
4
Impact of time to treatment on the effects of bivalirudin vs. glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and heparin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.治疗时间对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中比伐卢定与糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂及肝素疗效的影响:来自HORIZONS-AMI试验的见解
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1144-1153. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I9A186.
5
Bivalirudin versus heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pooled patient-level analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials.比伐卢定与肝素联合或不联合糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂用于行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:来自 HORIZONS-AMI 和 EUROMAX 试验的汇总患者水平分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.029.
6
Bivalirudin versus heparin with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.比伐卢定与普通肝素用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Heparin Versus Bivalirudin Monotherapy in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中肝素与比伐卢定单药治疗的比较
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Feb;50(2):141-51. doi: 10.1177/1060028015618206. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Impact of bivalirudin on outcomes after percutaneous coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents.比伐卢定对药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉血运重建术后结局的影响。
Am Heart J. 2007 Oct;154(4):695-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.023. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
9
Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用比伐卢定。
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2218-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708191.
10
Bleeding risk and outcomes of Bivalirudin versus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors with targeted low-dose unfractionated Heparin in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention for either stable or unstable angina pectoris.在因稳定型或不稳定型心绞痛接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,比伐卢定与糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂联合低剂量普通肝素相比的出血风险及结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15;102(2):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.030. Epub 2008 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Bivalirudin versus heparin in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比伐卢定与肝素在急性冠脉综合征患者当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(2):309-320. doi: 10.5603/cj.90956. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
2
Assessing the external validity of the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial.评估 VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART 试验的外部有效性。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):427-435. doi: 10.1177/17407745211012438. Epub 2021 May 20.