Western Michigan University.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jan;85(1):77-79. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000108.
Comment on the issue of temporal precedence and the implications for interpreting the results of the mediation analyses in the Child/Adolescent Multimodal Treatment Study.
Review of Kendall et al. (2016).
Kendall et al. reported that residualized (baseline to posttreatment) change in coping efficacy, but not anxious self-talk, mediated residualized (baseline to follow-up) change in anxiety symptoms in cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), sertraline (SRT), and CBT + SRT compared to placebo. Because the measure of anxiety symptoms included data from follow-up, it was concluded that "the gains being referred to can be viewed as 'change following treatment'" (p. 8) and, therefore, the analyses captured "true temporal precedence" (p. 3). However, the anxiety scores represented an amalgam of change occurring within and after treatment, and available data suggest much of the anxiety change occurred during the treatment, the time when the change in coping occurred.
Given the measurement timeline, a clear and unambiguous claim of demonstrating temporal precedence is not justified. Nonetheless, these results remain important for other reasons when interpreted in the context of the broad cognitive-behavioral conceptual model of anxiety that led to the selection of these mediators for examination. (PsycINFO Database Record
评论时间优先顺序的问题及其对中介分析结果解释的影响,该研究来自儿童/青少年多模式治疗研究。
肯德尔等人(2016 年)的综述。
肯德尔等人报告说,应对效能的残差(从基线到治疗后)变化,但不是焦虑性自言自语,在认知行为疗法(CBT)、舍曲林(SRT)和 CBT+SRT 中中介了焦虑症状的残差(从基线到随访)变化,而安慰剂则没有。由于焦虑症状的测量包括了随访数据,因此可以得出结论,“所提到的收益可以被视为‘治疗后的变化’”(第 8 页),因此,分析捕捉到了“真正的时间优先顺序”(第 3 页)。然而,焦虑评分代表了治疗内和治疗后发生的变化的混合,并且可用数据表明,大部分焦虑变化发生在治疗期间,即应对变化发生的时间。
鉴于测量时间线,不能明确证明时间优先顺序的主张是合理的。尽管如此,当根据导致选择这些中介物进行检查的广泛的认知行为焦虑概念模型来解释时,这些结果仍然具有重要意义。