Suppr超能文献

肝脏磁共振弹性成像检查的技术失败:来自一项大型单中心研究的经验

Technical Failure of MR Elastography Examinations of the Liver: Experience from a Large Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Wagner Mathilde, Corcuera-Solano Idoia, Lo Grace, Esses Steven, Liao Joseph, Besa Cecilia, Chen Nelson, Abraham Ginu, Fung Maggie, Babb James S, Ehman Richard L, Taouli Bachir

机构信息

From the Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute (M.W., I.C.S., C.B., N.C., B.T.) and Department of Radiology (I.C.S., G.L., S.E., J.L., C.B., G.A., B.T.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029; MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, New York, NY (M.F.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (J.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (R.L.E.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):401-412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160863. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

Purpose To assess the determinants of technical failure of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography of the liver in a large single-center study. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Seven hundred eighty-one MR elastography examinations performed in 691 consecutive patients (mean age, 58 years; male patients, 434 [62.8%]) in a single center between June 2013 and August 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. MR elastography was performed at 3.0 T (n = 443) or 1.5 T (n = 338) by using a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence. MR elastography and anatomic image analysis were performed by two observers. Additional observers measured liver T2* and fat fraction. Technical failure was defined as no pixel value with a confidence index higher than 95% and/or no apparent shear waves imaged. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess potential predictive factors of technical failure of MR elastography. Results The technical failure rate of MR elastography at 1.5 T was 3.5% (12 of 338), while it was higher, 15.3% (68 of 443), at 3.0 T. On the basis of univariate analysis, body mass index, liver iron deposition, massive ascites, use of 3.0 T, presence of cirrhosis, and alcoholic liver disease were all significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004); but on the basis of multivariable analysis, only body mass index, liver iron deposition, massive ascites, and use of 3.0 T were significantly associated with failure of MR elastography (P < .004). Conclusion The technical failure rate of MR elastography with a gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence was low at 1.5 T but substantially higher at 3.0 T. Massive ascites, iron deposition, and high body mass index were additional independent factors associated with failure of MR elastography of the liver with a two-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo pulse sequence. RSNA, 2017.

摘要

目的 在一项大型单中心研究中评估肝脏磁共振(MR)弹性成像技术失败的决定因素。材料与方法 本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准。对2013年6月至2014年8月期间在单中心对691例连续患者(平均年龄58岁;男性患者434例[62.8%])进行的781次MR弹性成像检查进行回顾性评估。采用梯度回波脉冲序列在3.0 T(n = 443)或1.5 T(n = 338)下进行MR弹性成像。由两名观察者进行MR弹性成像和解剖图像分析。其他观察者测量肝脏T2*和脂肪分数。技术失败定义为没有置信指数高于95%的像素值和/或没有成像的明显剪切波。进行逻辑回归分析以评估MR弹性成像技术失败的潜在预测因素。结果 1.5 T时MR弹性成像的技术失败率为3.5%(338例中的12例),而在3.0 T时更高,为15.3%(443例中的68例)。基于单因素分析,体重指数、肝脏铁沉积、大量腹水、使用3.0 T、肝硬化的存在以及酒精性肝病均与MR弹性成像失败显著相关(P < .004);但基于多因素分析,只有体重指数、肝脏铁沉积、大量腹水和使用3.0 T与MR弹性成像失败显著相关(P < .004)。结论 采用梯度回波脉冲序列的MR弹性成像技术失败率在1.5 T时较低,但在3.0 T时显著较高。大量腹水、铁沉积和高体重指数是与二维梯度回波脉冲序列肝脏MR弹性成像失败相关的其他独立因素。RSNA,2017年。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验