Debinski Beata, McDonald Eileen, Frattaroli Shannon, Shields Wendy, Omaki Elise, Gielen Andrea C
From the *Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; and †Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):225-229. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000484.
An urban fire department has been distributing free smoke alarms for more than 30 years. A community-academic partnership was developed to conduct a community intervention trial as part of the fire department's home visiting program. The trial comprised 170 canvassing events held across 12 census tracts; half of the census tracts were assigned to the treatment condition and received prepromotion of the home visit events. The objectives of this analysis were to identify environmental and programmatic predictors of 1) whether someone would be at home at the time of a visit, and 2) if at home, whether the resident would participate. A separate multilevel analysis was conducted to address each objective. The canvassing event served as the first level to account for variation in implementation of the program, with the census tract as the second level. All environmental and program characteristics were included as fixed effects in both models. Throughout 170 events, 8080 eligible residential addresses were visited, of which 3216 had someone at home, and 2197 homes participated in the program. Canvassing events held on weekends and during the evening hours was associated with higher odds of a resident being at home. Canvassing events without rain and held in the treatment census tract areas was associated with higher odds of resident participation. Environmental and programmatic factors can impact the reach of home visiting programs. These findings can contribute to emerging best practices for fire department home visiting programs.
一个城市消防部门30多年来一直在免费发放烟雾报警器。作为消防部门家访计划的一部分,建立了社区与学术机构的合作关系来开展一项社区干预试验。该试验包括在12个人口普查区举办的170次拉票活动;一半的人口普查区被分配到治疗组,并提前宣传家访活动。本分析的目的是确定以下两个方面的环境和计划预测因素:1)家访时是否有人在家;2)如果有人在家,居民是否会参与。针对每个目标进行了单独的多层次分析。拉票活动作为第一层次,以解释计划实施中的差异,人口普查区作为第二层次。所有环境和计划特征在两个模型中均作为固定效应纳入。在170次活动中,共走访了8080个符合条件的住宅地址,其中3216个有人在家,2197户家庭参与了该计划。在周末和晚上进行的拉票活动与居民在家的几率较高有关。在无雨的情况下且在治疗组人口普查区进行的拉票活动与居民参与的几率较高有关。环境和计划因素会影响家访计划的覆盖范围。这些发现有助于为消防部门家访计划形成新的最佳实践。