Mundwiler Jonas, Schüpbach Ulla, Dieterle Thomas, Leuppi Jörg Daniel, Schmidt-Trucksäss Arno, Wolfer David Paul, Miedinger David, Brighenti-Zogg Stefanie
University Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Department of Sport Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168683. eCollection 2017.
Objective data on the association of maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) with work related physical activity are sparse. Thus, it is not clear whether occupational physical activity (OPA) contributes to an increase of VO2max. This study examined the association of VO2max with work and non-work related physical activity in a Swiss working population.
In this cross-sectional study, a total of 337 healthy and full-time employed adults were recruited. Demographic data, height, weight and BMI were recorded in all subjects. Participants were classified into nine occupational categories (ISCO-88) and merged into three groups with low, moderate, and high OPA. Physical activity was objectively measured by the SenseWear Mini Armband on seven consecutive days (23 hours per day). Participants were regarded as sufficiently active when accumulating ≥30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day. VO2max was evaluated using the multistage 20-meter shuttle run test.
Data of 303 participants were considered for analysis (63% male, age 33 yrs, SD 12). Multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.69) revealed significant positive associations of VO2max with leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) at vigorous intensity (β = 0.212) and sufficient moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (β = 0.100) on workdays. Female gender (β = -0.622), age (β = -0.264), BMI (β = -0.220), the ratio of maximum to resting heart rate (β = 0.192), occupational group (low vs. high OPA, β = -0.141), and smoking (β = -0.133) were also identified as independent predictors of VO2max.
The present results suggest that VO2max is positively associated with LTPA, but not with OPA on workdays. This finding emphasizes the need for employees to engage in sufficient high-intensity physical activity in recreation for maintaining or improving VO2max with regard to health benefits.
关于最大有氧能力(VO2max)与工作相关体力活动之间关联的客观数据稀少。因此,职业体力活动(OPA)是否有助于提高VO2max尚不清楚。本研究调查了瑞士工作人群中VO2max与工作及非工作相关体力活动之间的关联。
在这项横断面研究中,共招募了337名健康的全职成年雇员。记录了所有受试者的人口统计学数据、身高、体重和体重指数。参与者被分为九个职业类别(国际标准职业分类-88),并合并为低、中、高OPA三组。通过连续七天(每天23小时)佩戴SenseWear Mini臂带客观测量体力活动。当参与者每天积累≥30分钟的中度至剧烈体力活动时,被视为体力活动充足。使用多级20米穿梭跑测试评估VO2max。
303名参与者的数据用于分析(63%为男性,年龄33岁,标准差12)。多元线性回归分析(调整后R2 = 0.69)显示,VO2max与工作日剧烈强度的休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)(β = 0.212)和充足的中度至剧烈体力活动(β = 0.100)呈显著正相关。女性(β = -0.622)、年龄(β = -0.264)、BMI(β = -0.220)、最大心率与静息心率之比(β = 0.192)、职业组(低OPA与高OPA,β = -0.141)和吸烟(β = -0.133)也被确定为VO2max的独立预测因素。
目前的结果表明,VO2max与LTPA呈正相关,但与工作日的OPA无关。这一发现强调了员工需要在休闲时间进行足够的高强度体力活动,以维持或提高VO2max,从而获得健康益处。