Karpova Darja, Bräuninger Susanne, Wiercinska Eliza, Krämer Ariane, Stock Belinda, Graff Jochen, Martin Hans, Wach Achim, Escot Christophe, Douglas Garry, Romagnoli Barbara, Chevalier Eric, Dembowski Klaus, Hooftman Leon, Bonig Halvard
German Red Cross Blood Service BaWüHe, Institute Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Stem Cell Biology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Transl Med. 2017 Jan 3;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2.
Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CSF.
Healthy male volunteer donors with a documented average mobilization response to G-CSF received, following ≥6 weeks wash-out, a 1-2 h infusion of 500-2500 µg/kg of balixafortide. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed.
Balixafortide was well tolerated and rated favorably over G-CSF by subjects. At all doses tested balixafortide mobilized HSPC. In the dose range between 1500 and 2500 µg/kg mobilization was similar, reaching 38.2 ± 2.8 CD34 + cells/µL (mean ± SEM). Balixafortide caused mixed leukocytosis in the mid-20 K/µL range. B-lymphocytosis was more pronounced, whereas neutrophilia and monocytosis were markedly less accentuated with balixafortide compared to G-CSF. At the 24 h time point, leukocytes had largely normalized.
Balixafortide is safe, well tolerated, and induces efficient mobilization of HSPCs in healthy male volunteers. Based on experience with current apheresis technology, the observed mobilization at doses ≥1500 µg/kg of balixafortide is predicted to yield in a single apheresis a standard dose of 4× 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg from most individuals donating for an approximately weight-matched recipient. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens may provide even higher mobilization responses. Trial Registration European Medicines Agency (EudraCT-Nr. 2011-003316-23) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01841476).
标准造血干细胞和祖细胞(HSPC)动员剂粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)存在某些缺点,促使人们寻求替代方案。我们在此报告一项I期剂量递增试验的结果,该试验比较了肽类CXCR4拮抗剂POL6326(巴利昔单抗)与G-CSF的动员效果。
对G-CSF有记录的平均动员反应的健康男性志愿者供者,在洗脱≥6周后,接受1-2小时的500-2500μg/kg巴利昔单抗输注。评估安全性、耐受性、药代动力学和药效学。
巴利昔单抗耐受性良好,受试者对其评价优于G-CSF。在所有测试剂量下,巴利昔单抗均能动员HSPC。在1500至2500μg/kg的剂量范围内,动员效果相似,达到38.2±2.8个CD34+细胞/μL(平均值±标准误)。巴利昔单抗引起中等程度的白细胞增多,范围在20K/μL左右。B淋巴细胞增多更为明显,而与G-CSF相比,巴利昔单抗引起的中性粒细胞增多和单核细胞增多明显减轻。在24小时时间点,白细胞已基本恢复正常。
巴利昔单抗安全、耐受性良好,并能在健康男性志愿者中有效动员HSPC。基于当前单采技术的经验,预计在大多数为体重匹配受者捐献的个体中,以≥1500μg/kg的剂量使用巴利昔单抗进行动员,单次单采可获得4×10E6个CD34+细胞/kg的标准剂量。探索替代给药方案可能会提供更高的动员反应。试验注册欧洲药品管理局(EudraCT编号:2011-003316-23)和ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01841476)。