Park Jung-Chul, Koo Ki-Tae, Lim Hyun-Chang
Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry, Cheonan, Korea .
Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea .
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):415-425. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.415. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
The present study investigated the impact of 2 different suture techniques, the conventional crossed mattress suture (X suture) and the novel hidden X suture, for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with an open healing approach.
This study was a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Fourteen patients requiring extraction of the maxillary or mandibular posterior teeth were enrolled and allocated into 2 groups. After extraction, demineralized bovine bone matrix mixed with 10% collagen (DBBM-C) was grafted and the socket was covered by porcine collagen membrane in a double-layer fashion. No attempt to obtain primary closure was made. The hidden X suture and conventional X suture techniques were performed in the test and control groups, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images were taken immediately after the graft procedure and before implant surgery 4 months later. Additionally, the change in the mucogingival junction (MGJ) position was measured and was compared after extraction, after suturing, and 4 months after the operation.
All sites healed without any complications. Clinical evaluations showed that the MGJ line shifted to the lingual side immediately after the application of the X suture by 1.56±0.90 mm in the control group, while the application of the hidden X suture rather pushed the MGJ line slightly to the buccal side by 0.25±0.66 mm. It was demonstrated that the amount of keratinized tissue (KT) preserved on the buccal side was significantly greater in the hidden X suture group 4 months after the procedure (<0.05). Radiographic analysis showed that the hidden X suture had a significant effect in preserving horizontal width and minimizing vertical reduction in comparison to X suture (<0.05).
Our study provided clinical and radiographic verification of the efficacy of the hidden X suture in preserving the width of KT and the dimensions of the alveolar ridge after ARP.
本研究探讨了两种不同缝合技术,即传统交叉褥式缝合(X缝合)和新型隐匿X缝合,在开放性愈合方式下用于牙槽嵴保存(ARP)的效果。
本研究为前瞻性随机对照临床试验。纳入14例需要拔除上颌或下颌后牙的患者,并分为两组。拔牙后,植入混合10%胶原蛋白的脱矿牛骨基质(DBBM-C),并用猪胶原蛋白膜双层覆盖牙槽窝。未尝试进行一期缝合。试验组和对照组分别采用隐匿X缝合技术和传统X缝合技术。在植骨手术后立即以及4个月后种植手术前拍摄锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。此外,测量并比较拔牙后、缝合后以及术后4个月时黏膜牙龈交界(MGJ)位置的变化。
所有部位均顺利愈合,无任何并发症。临床评估显示,对照组应用X缝合后,MGJ线立即向舌侧移位1.56±0.90 mm,而应用隐匿X缝合则使MGJ线轻微向颊侧推移0.25±0.66 mm。结果表明,术后4个月,隐匿X缝合组颊侧保留的角化组织(KT)量显著更多(<0.05)。影像学分析显示,与X缝合相比,隐匿X缝合在保留水平宽度和最小化垂直吸收方面具有显著效果(<0.05)。
我们的研究为隐匿X缝合在ARP后保留KT宽度和牙槽嵴尺寸方面的疗效提供了临床和影像学验证。