Mohan Lakshmi, Rao Arun, Ullal Sonali, Krishna Gowtham
Assistant Surgeon, Govt. Urban Health Training Centre (UHTC) , Ambalappuzha, Kerala, India. [Formerly (During Study Period), Junior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India] .
Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Karnataka, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):QC01-QC03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20686.8867. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Suspicious adnexal masses are common clinical problems in gynaecological practice. A reliable diagnostic tool for the early detection of the ovarian malignancy is essential.
To validate a new scoring system -Pelvic Mass Score (PMS) in predicting the nature of the adnexal mass pre-operatively.
A prospective observational study was carried out in 100 consenting women with an undiagnosed adnexal mass requiring operative intervention. Among them 62 patients had mass with a feeding vessel in which the Doppler velocimetry study values were available. The PMS was determined in these 62 patients. A score of 29 or more was taken as suggestive of malignancy. The results were compared with the histopathological diagnosis to confirm malignancy. The chi-square test was applied to test the significance.
Among the 62 patients with vascular mass, 31 had histopathological diagnosis of malignancy. The statistical analysis of the data with PMS with 29 as cut-off revealed 100% sensitivity and 100% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) as there was no false negative case detected. But the specificity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was poor; 45.2% and 64.6% respectively. Based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, if we redefine cut-off as 69, specificity increases to 80.6% with a sensitivity of 90.3%, the PPV and NPV being 82.35 and 89.29 respectively.
The present study concludes that, in suspicious vascular adnexal masses PMS can be used as a reliable diagnostic score to predict malignancy if we redefine the existing cut-off of 29 to 69.
附件包块可疑是妇科临床常见问题。一种用于早期检测卵巢恶性肿瘤的可靠诊断工具至关重要。
验证一种新的评分系统——盆腔包块评分(PMS),用于术前预测附件包块的性质。
对100例同意参与的患有未确诊附件包块且需要手术干预的女性进行前瞻性观察研究。其中62例患者的包块有供血血管,可获得多普勒测速研究值。对这62例患者测定PMS。将29分及以上视为恶性肿瘤的提示。将结果与组织病理学诊断进行比较以确诊恶性肿瘤。应用卡方检验来检验其显著性。
在62例有血管性包块的患者中,31例经组织病理学诊断为恶性肿瘤。以29分为临界值对PMS数据进行统计分析显示,由于未检测到假阴性病例,敏感性为100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为100%。但特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)较差,分别为45.2%和64.6%。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,如果将临界值重新定义为69,特异性增至80.6%,敏感性为90.3%,PPV和NPV分别为82.35和89.29。
本研究得出结论,在可疑的血管性附件包块中,如果将现有临界值29重新定义为69,PMS可作为预测恶性肿瘤的可靠诊断评分。