Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment.
作者信息
Wright Sarah R, Homer Matt
机构信息
Michael Garron Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
出版信息
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Feb;6(1):7-9. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0323-z.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment.解决评估中的理论与实践差距问题。
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Feb;6(1):7-9. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0323-z.
2
The perceptions of nurse teachers, student nurses and preceptors of the theory-practice gap in nurse education.护士教师、实习护士和带教老师对护理教育中理论与实践差距的认知。
Nurse Educ Today. 2000 Aug;20(6):499-505. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0414.
3
Theory-practice debate: setting the scene.理论与实践的辩论：开篇介绍
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1989 Mar-May;6(3):12-20.
4
The theory-practice gap in cognitive behavioral therapy: reflections and a modest proposal to bridge the gap.认知行为疗法中的理论-实践差距：反思与弥合差距的温和建议。
Behav Ther. 2013 Dec;44(4):559-67. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
5
Hand hygiene compliance: is there a theory-practice-ethics gap?手部卫生依从性：理论、实践与伦理之间是否存在差距？
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(17):1011-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.17.1011.
6
Reflections on the theory-practice gap in cognitive behavior therapy.对认知行为疗法理论-实践差距的反思。
Behav Ther. 2013 Dec;44(4):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
7
The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap.患者决策支持干预措施的设计：解决理论与实践之间的差距。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01517.x. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
[To fill the gap between theory and practice: a model of clinical nursing].[填补理论与实践之间的差距：临床护理模式]
Prof Inferm. 1999 Apr-Jun;52(2):80-3.
9
The family theory-practice gap: a matter of clarity?家庭理论与实践的差距：是清晰度的问题吗？
Nurs Inq. 2005 Sep;12(3):210-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00270.x.
10
Exacerbation of a perennial problem? The theory-practice gap and changes in nurse education.一个长期存在问题的恶化？理论与实践的差距以及护士教育的变革。
Prof Nurse. 1994 Dec;10(3):183-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Identification of a Theory-Practice Gap in the Education of Biomedical Scientists.识别生物医学科学家教育中的理论与实践差距。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Jun 12;81:12629. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12629. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale.确保对小群体进行的多项选择题考试的质量：一个警示故事。
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Feb;6(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0322-0.
2
Setting standards in knowledge assessments: Comparing Ebel and Cohen via Rasch.
Med Teach. 2016 Dec;38(12):1267-1277. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230184. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85.如何制定基于表现的考试标准：AMEE 指南第 85 号。
Med Teach. 2014 Feb;36(2):97-110. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.计划性评估与凯恩的效度观。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x.
5
General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57.评估中使用的理论概述：AMEE 指南第 57 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(10):783-97. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611022.
6
How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics - AMEE guide no. 49.如何衡量客观结构化临床考试（OSCE）的质量：指标综述- AMEE 指南第 49 号。
Med Teach. 2010;32(10):802-11. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507716.
7
Research in medical education: balancing service and science.医学教育研究：平衡服务与科学
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Feb;12(1):103-15. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
Zotero 插件