• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间信息传播与感知感染风险的社会大数据分析

Social Big Data Analysis of Information Spread and Perceived Infection Risk During the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak in South Korea.

作者信息

Song Juyoung, Song Tae Min, Seo Dong-Chul, Jin Dal-Lae, Kim Jung Sun

机构信息

1 Administration of Justice, Pennsylvania State University , Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania.

2 Research Center on Big Data, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs , Seoul, South Korea .

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):22-29. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0126. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2016.0126
PMID:28051336
Abstract

We investigated online diffusion of information, spread of fear, and perceived risk of infection to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) as cases of MERS spread rapidly and dozens of fatalities occurred in South Korea in May-June of 2015. This study retrieved 8,671,695 MERS-related online documents from May 20 to June 18, 2015, from 171 Korean online channels and analyzed such documents by using multilevel models and data mining with Apriori algorithm association analysis. We used R software (version 3.2.1) for the association analysis data mining and visualization. Buzz with negative emotions (i.e., anxiety or fear) was more prevalent in online discussion boards, Twitter, and online cafes than news sites and blogs. News buzz (b = 0.21, p < 0.001), but not rumor buzz (b = 0.06, p = 0.308), was associated with positive MERS emotions (i.e., being calm or composed). The mention of eating immunity-boosting food in the news led to a 94 percent chance of a positive MERS emotion and that such a chance of showing a positive emotion was 4.75 times higher than that without such a mention (support of 0.001, confidence of 0.94, and lift of 4.75). Even with the same precautionary messages that were disseminated, they yielded the opposite emotional reactions to people depending on the channel through which the messages were communicated. In the face of a novel and highly contagious disease such as MERS, the government must deploy a response system that includes provision and dissemination of reliable information and inhibits online diffusion of false information.

摘要

2015年5月至6月间,中东呼吸综合征(MERS)病例在韩国迅速传播,出现了数十例死亡病例,我们针对MERS相关信息的网络传播、恐慌情绪蔓延以及感染风险认知展开了调查。本研究从171个韩国网络渠道中检索了2015年5月20日至6月18日期间的8671695份与MERS相关的网络文档,并运用多层次模型以及Apriori算法关联分析的数据挖掘方法对这些文档进行分析。我们使用R软件(版本3.2.1)进行关联分析的数据挖掘与可视化处理。带有负面情绪(如焦虑或恐惧)的舆论在在线论坛、推特和网吧中比在新闻网站和博客中更为普遍。新闻舆论(b = 0.21,p < 0.001),而非谣言舆论(b = 0.06,p = 0.308),与积极的MERS情绪(如冷静或沉着)相关。新闻中提及食用增强免疫力的食物会带来94%的可能性产生积极的MERS情绪,且出现积极情绪的可能性比未提及这种食物时高出4.75倍(支持度为0.001,置信度为0.94,提升度为4.75)。即便传播的是相同的预防信息,根据信息传播的渠道不同,人们产生的情绪反应却截然相反。面对像MERS这样新型且具有高度传染性的疾病,政府必须部署一个应对系统,包括提供和传播可靠信息,并抑制虚假信息在网络上的传播。

相似文献

1
Social Big Data Analysis of Information Spread and Perceived Infection Risk During the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak in South Korea.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间信息传播与感知感染风险的社会大数据分析
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):22-29. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0126. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
2
Public Health Network Structure and Collaboration Effectiveness during the 2015 MERS Outbreak in South Korea: An Institutional Collective Action Framework.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间的公共卫生网络结构与协作成效:一个制度性集体行动框架
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 15;14(9):1064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091064.
3
[Epidemiological characteristics of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak in the Republic of Korea, 2015].[2015年大韩民国中东呼吸综合征疫情的流行病学特征]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;36(8):836-41.
4
South Korea tackles virus outbreak.韩国应对病毒爆发。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Jun 17;29(42):11. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.42.11.s12.
5
When Information from Public Health Officials is Untrustworthy: The Use of Online News, Interpersonal Networks, and Social Media during the MERS Outbreak in South Korea.当公共卫生官员的信息不可信时:在韩国 MERS 爆发期间使用在线新闻、人际网络和社交媒体。
Health Commun. 2019 Aug;34(9):991-998. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1449552. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
High correlation of Middle East respiratory syndrome spread with Google search and Twitter trends in Korea.韩国中东呼吸综合征传播与谷歌搜索和推特趋势高度相关。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 6;6:32920. doi: 10.1038/srep32920.
7
Objective Determination of End of MERS Outbreak, South Korea, 2015.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情结束时间的客观判定
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;22(1):146-8. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.151383.
8
The clinical and virological features of the first imported case causing MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea, 2015.2015年韩国首例导致中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)疫情爆发的输入性病例的临床及病毒学特征
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2576-5.
9
Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the Molecular Diagnosis of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome During an Outbreak in Korea in 2015.韩国检验医学学会《2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间分子诊断实践指南》
Ann Lab Med. 2016 May;36(3):203-8. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.3.203.
10
Clinical Implications of 5 Cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection in a South Korean Outbreak.韩国中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒感染5例病例的临床意义
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 21;69(5):361-6. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2015.445. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitively motivated or emotionally charged? Issue-switching mechanism of second screening-facilitated political participation during the 2022 COVID-19 waves in China.认知驱动还是情绪使然?2022年中国新冠疫情期间二次筛查促进政治参与的议题转换机制
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 6;10(12):e32367. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32367. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Effects of Wuxi CDC WeChat official account article features on user engagement in health promotion.无锡市疾病预防控制中心微信公众号文章特征对健康促进中用户参与度的影响
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18277-4.
3
Risk perception, compliance with COVID-19 measures, and the role of social media after China's lockdown lift.
中国解除封锁后,风险认知、对新冠疫情防控措施的遵守情况以及社交媒体的作用
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 20;10(3):e24821. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24821. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
4
Exploring Future Signals of COVID-19 and Response to Information Diffusion Using Social Media Big Data.利用社交媒体大数据探索 COVID-19 的未来信号及其对信息传播的响应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 8;20(9):5753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095753.
5
The Influence of SNS on Policy Support to Mitigate Public Health Crises: The Mediating Role of General and Personal Risk Perceptions.社交媒体对减轻公共卫生危机政策支持的影响:一般风险感知和个人风险感知的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10933. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710933.
6
Research on older people's health information search behavior based on risk perception in social networks-A case study in China during COVID-19.基于社交网络中风险感知的老年人健康信息搜索行为研究——以新冠疫情期间中国为例
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;10:946742. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946742. eCollection 2022.
7
The impact of social media on risk perceptions during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia.社交媒体对沙特阿拉伯新冠疫情期间风险认知的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;10:898041. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898041. eCollection 2022.
8
The Effects of Receiving and Expressing Health Information on Social Media during the COVID-19 Infodemic: An Online Survey among Malaysians.在 COVID-19 信息疫情期间,通过社交媒体接收和传播健康信息的影响:一项针对马来西亚人的在线调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137991.
9
The Differential Consequences of Fear, Anger, and Depression in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea.韩国人因 COVID-19 而对恐惧、愤怒和抑郁产生的不同后果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116723.
10
"Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I Am": Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users.“其他人比我更容易受到假新闻的影响”:新冠疫情假新闻对社交媒体用户的第三人效应
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Dec;125:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950. Epub 2021 Jul 12.