Carrión Ricardo E, Correll Christoph U, Auther Andrea M, Cornblatt Barbara A
Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY.
Department of Psychiatry, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):64-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw155.
Clinical staging improved the possibility of intervening during the psychosis prodrome to limit progression of illness. The current study aimed to validate a novel 4-stage severity-based model with a focus on clinical change over time and risk for conversion to psychosis. One hundred seventy-one individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis were followed prospectively (3 ± 1.6 y) as part of the Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program and divided into 4 diagnostic stages according to absence/presence and severity of attenuated positive symptoms. Twenty-two percent of the combined sample recovered (no prodromal symptoms) by study outcome. The negative symptoms only subgroup had the highest symptom stability (70%), but the lowest conversion rate at 5.9%. The subgroup with more severe baseline attenuated positive symptom levels had a higher conversion rate (28%) and a more rapid onset when compared to the moderate attenuated positive symptom subgroup (11%). Finally, the Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis (SLP) subgroup showed low stability (3%), with 49% developing a specific psychotic disorder. The proposed stage model provides a more finely grained classification system than the standard diagnostic approach for prodromal individuals. All 4 stages are in need of early intervention because of low recovery rates. The negative symptom only stage is possibly a separate clinical syndrome, with an increased risk of functional disability. Both subgroups with attenuated positive symptoms are appropriate for studying the mechanisms of psychosis risk, however, individuals with more severe baseline positive symptoms appear better suited to clinical trials. Finally, the SLP category represents an intermediate outcome group appropriate for preventative intervention research but questionable for inclusion in prodromal studies of mechanisms.
临床分期提高了在精神病前驱期进行干预以限制疾病进展的可能性。本研究旨在验证一种新的基于严重程度的四阶段模型,重点关注随时间的临床变化以及转化为精神病的风险。作为识别与预防(RAP)项目的一部分,对171名临床高危(CHR)精神病患者进行了前瞻性随访(3±1.6年),并根据减弱的阳性症状的有无和严重程度分为4个诊断阶段。到研究结束时,联合样本中有22%康复(无前驱症状)。仅表现阴性症状的亚组症状稳定性最高(70%),但转化率最低,为5.9%。与中度减弱阳性症状亚组(11%)相比,基线减弱阳性症状水平更严重的亚组转化率更高(28%),且起病更快。最后,类精神分裂症性精神病(SLP)亚组稳定性较低(3%),49%发展为特定的精神病性障碍。所提出的阶段模型为前驱个体提供了比标准诊断方法更精细的分类系统。由于康复率低,所有4个阶段都需要早期干预。仅表现阴性症状的阶段可能是一个单独的临床综合征,功能残疾风险增加。两个有减弱阳性症状的亚组都适合研究精神病风险机制,然而,基线阳性症状更严重的个体似乎更适合进行临床试验。最后,SLP类别代表了一个适合预防性干预研究的中间结果组,但对于纳入机制的前驱研究存在疑问。