• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超高危个体中短暂有限间歇性精神病性症状(BLIPS)的诊断及预后意义

Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS) in Individuals at Ultra High Risk.

作者信息

Fusar-Poli Paolo, Cappucciati Marco, De Micheli Andrea, Rutigliano Grazia, Bonoldi Ilaria, Tognin Stefania, Ramella-Cravaro Valentina, Castagnini Augusto, McGuire Philip

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK;

OASIS Service, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw151.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbw151
PMID:28053130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5216865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS) are key inclusion criteria to define individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR). Their diagnostic and prognostic significance is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To address the baseline diagnostic relationship between BLIPS and the ICD-10 categories and examine the longitudinal prognostic impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

Prospective long-term study in UHR individuals meeting BLIPS criteria. Sociodemographic and clinical data, including ICD-10 diagnoses, were automatically drawn from electronic health records and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier failure function (1-survival), Cox regression models, bootstrapping methods, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Eighty BLIPS were included. At baseline, two-thirds (68%) of BLIPS met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-10 Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorder (ATPD), most featuring schizophrenic symptoms. The remaining individuals met ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for unspecified nonorganic psychosis (15%), mental and behavioral disorders due to use of cannabinoids (11%), and mania with psychotic symptoms (6%). The overall 5-year risk of psychosis was 0.54. Recurrent episodes of BLIPS were relatively rare (11%) but associated with a higher risk of psychosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.98) than mono-episodic BLIPS at the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that seriously disorganizing or dangerous features increased greatly (HR = 4.39) the risk of psychosis (0.89 at 5-year). Bootstrapping confirmed the robustness of this predictor (area under the ROC = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

BLIPS are most likely to fulfill the ATPD criteria, mainly acute schizophrenic subtypes. About half of BLIPS cases develops a psychotic disorder during follow-up. Recurrent BLIPS are relatively rare but tend to develop into psychosis. BLIPS with seriously disorganizing or dangerous features have an extreme high risk of psychosis.

摘要

背景

短暂有限间歇性精神病性症状(BLIPS)是定义精神病超高风险(UHR)个体的关键纳入标准。其诊断和预后意义尚不清楚。

目的

探讨BLIPS与ICD - 10类别之间的基线诊断关系,并研究临床和社会人口学因素的纵向预后影响。

方法

对符合BLIPS标准的UHR个体进行前瞻性长期研究。社会人口学和临床数据,包括ICD - 10诊断,自动从电子健康记录中提取,并使用Kaplan - Meier失败函数(1 - 生存率)、Cox回归模型、自助法和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行分析。

结果

纳入80例BLIPS患者。基线时,三分之二(68%)的BLIPS符合ICD - 10急性和短暂性精神病性障碍(ATPD)的诊断标准,大多数表现为精神分裂症症状。其余个体符合ICD - 10未特定的非器质性精神病(15%)、使用大麻所致精神和行为障碍(11%)以及伴有精神病性症状的躁狂症(6%)的诊断标准。精神病的总体5年风险为0.54。BLIPS的复发相对少见(11%),但在单变量分析中,与单次发作的BLIPS相比,复发与更高的精神病风险相关(风险比[HR] 3.98)。多变量分析显示,严重的紊乱或危险特征使精神病风险大幅增加(HR = 4.39)(5年时为0.89)。自助法证实了该预测指标的稳健性(ROC曲线下面积 = 0.74)。

结论

BLIPS最有可能符合ATPD标准,主要是急性精神分裂症亚型。约一半的BLIPS病例在随访期间发展为精神病性障碍。复发的BLIPS相对少见,但倾向于发展为精神病。具有严重紊乱或危险特征的BLIPS患精神病的风险极高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/5216865/36dc79fb96e8/schbul_sbw151_f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/5216865/5ce56820df3e/schbul_sbw151_f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/5216865/36dc79fb96e8/schbul_sbw151_f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/5216865/5ce56820df3e/schbul_sbw151_f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/5216865/36dc79fb96e8/schbul_sbw151_f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS) in Individuals at Ultra High Risk.超高危个体中短暂有限间歇性精神病性症状(BLIPS)的诊断及预后意义
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw151.
2
Unmet needs for treatment in 102 individuals with brief and limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS): implications for current clinical recommendations.102 例短暂性和有限间歇性精神病症状(BLIPS)个体治疗未满足的需求:对当前临床建议的影响。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Nov 19;29:e67. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000635.
3
Prognosis of Brief Psychotic Episodes: A Meta-analysis.Brief 性精神病发作的预后:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;73(3):211-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2313.
4
Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome in Services for Individuals at Ultra High Risk for Psychosis.DSM-5 轻度精神病综合征在超高风险精神病患者服务中的诊断和预后意义。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Feb 15;44(2):264-275. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx055.
5
Ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis criteria: are there different levels of risk for transition to psychosis?超高危(UHR)精神病风险标准:向精神病转化是否存在不同水平的风险?
Schizophr Res. 2011 Jan;125(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
6
Development and temporal validation of a clinical prediction model of transition to psychosis in individuals at ultra-high risk in the UHR 1000+ cohort.UHR 1000+队列中超高风险个体向精神病转变的临床预测模型的开发与时间验证。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;23(3):400-410. doi: 10.1002/wps.21240.
7
Clinical outcomes in brief psychotic episodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.简短精神病性发作的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Nov 4;30:e71. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000548.
8
Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification.个体临床高风险人群中精神病风险的异质性:一项荟萃分析分层。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;73(2):113-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2324.
9
Checking the predictive accuracy of basic symptoms against ultra high-risk criteria and testing of a multivariable prediction model: Evidence from a prospective three-year observational study of persons at clinical high-risk for psychosis.针对超高危标准的基本症状预测准确性的检查和多变量预测模型的测试:来自对精神病临床高危人群进行为期三年的前瞻性观察研究的证据。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;45:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.026. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
10
Long term outcomes of acute and transient psychotic disorders: The missed opportunity of preventive interventions.急性和短暂性精神病障碍的长期结局:预防干预错失的机会。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;52:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
GABA receptor availability in clinical high-risk and first-episode psychosis: a [C]Ro15-4513 positron emission tomography study.临床高危和首发精神病患者中GABA受体可用性:一项[C]Ro15 - 4513正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03204-9.
2
Multimodal Prediction of Psychosis in the Prospective MoBa Birth Cohort.前瞻性母婴队列研究中精神病的多模态预测
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 20:rs.3.rs-6783339. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6783339/v1.
3
Enhancing early detection and treatment of psychosis in Germany: a protocol for the health economic evaluation of an artificial intelligence-guided complex intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term validity of the At Risk Mental State (ARMS) for predicting psychotic and non-psychotic mental disorders.高危精神状态(ARMS)预测精神病性和非精神病性精神障碍的长期有效性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
A Severity-Based Clinical Staging Model for the Psychosis Prodrome: Longitudinal Findings From the New York Recognition and Prevention Program.一种基于严重程度的精神病前驱期临床分期模型:来自纽约识别与预防项目的纵向研究结果
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):64-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw155.
3
The Role of Cognition and Social Functioning as Predictors in the Transition to Psychosis for Youth With Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms.
加强德国精神病的早期检测与治疗:一项关于人工智能引导的复杂干预措施的卫生经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e103151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103151.
4
Psychosis associated with cannabis withdrawal: systematic review and case series.与大麻戒断相关的精神病:系统评价与病例系列
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 3:1-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.175.
5
Antipsychotic Treatment in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Narrative Review of Suggestions for Clinical Practice.抗精神病药物治疗处于精神病临床高危人群:对临床实践建议的叙述性综述。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024;44(5):502-508. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001891. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
Parsing neurobiological heterogeneity of the clinical high-risk state for psychosis: A pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling study.解析精神病临床高危状态的神经生物学异质性:一项伪连续动脉自旋标记研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 8;14:1092213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1092213. eCollection 2023.
7
The Translational Future of Stress Neurobiology and Psychosis Vulnerability: A Review of the Evidence.压力神经生物学与精神分裂症易感性的转化研究前景:证据回顾。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(3):350-377. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230322145049.
8
Psychotic disorders as a framework for precision psychiatry.精神病障碍作为精准精神病学的框架。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2023 Apr;19(4):221-234. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00779-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
Mapping the implementation and challenges of clinical services for psychosis prevention in England.探究英国预防精神病临床服务的实施情况及面临的挑战。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 3;13:945505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.945505. eCollection 2022.
10
Identifying individuals at risk of developing psychosis: A systematic review of the literature in primary care services.识别有发展为精神病风险的个体:初级保健服务文献的系统回顾。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2023 May;17(5):429-446. doi: 10.1111/eip.13365. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
认知和社会功能作为有精神病性症状减弱的青少年向精神病转变的预测因素的作用。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):57-63. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw152. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS.迈向针对超高危精神病患者的标准化心理测量诊断访谈:综合评估高危精神状态量表(CAARMS)与精神状态高危综合征量表(SIPS)的比较
Psychiatry J. 2016;2016:7146341. doi: 10.1155/2016/7146341. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Diagnostic Stability of ICD/DSM First Episode Psychosis Diagnoses: Meta-analysis.国际疾病分类/精神疾病诊断与统计手册首次发作精神病诊断的诊断稳定性:荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1395-1406. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw020. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
6
Prognosis of Brief Psychotic Episodes: A Meta-analysis.Brief 性精神病发作的预后:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;73(3):211-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2313.
7
Deconstructing the Psychosis Risk Syndrome: Moving the Field of Prevention Forward.解构精神病风险综合征:推动预防领域向前发展。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;73(2):105-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2454.
8
Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification.个体临床高风险人群中精神病风险的异质性:一项荟萃分析分层。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;73(2):113-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2324.
9
Specificity of Incident Diagnostic Outcomes in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.临床高风险精神病患者新发诊断结果的特异性
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1066-75. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv091.
10
Short-term course and outcome of acute and transient psychotic disorders: Differences from other types of psychosis with acute onset.急性短暂性精神病障碍的短期病程和结局:与其他急性起病的精神病类型的差异。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;62(1):51-6. doi: 10.1177/0020764015590493. Epub 2015 Jun 18.