• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A novel adjustable dynamic plate for treatment of long bone fractures: An in vitro biomechanical study.一种用于治疗长骨骨折的新型可调式动力接骨板:一项体外生物力学研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(Suppl 2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
2
Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?锁定加压接骨板的生物力学测试——锁定内固定器的稳定性如何控制?
Injury. 2003 Nov;34 Suppl 2:B11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.021.
3
Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness.外置锁定加压钢板作为单侧外固定器的替代方案:轴向和扭转刚度的生物力学对比研究
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Apr;6(4):216-223. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470.
4
In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.有限接触动力加压钢板与锁定加压钢板的体外生物力学比较
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2005;18(4):220-6.
5
Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.锁定钢板结构中的经皮质螺钉能否提高温哥华B1型股骨假体周围骨折固定的刚度?两种不同钢板结构的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000704.
6
Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.肱骨近端两部分的外科颈骨折。两种固定技术的生物力学评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2258-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00757.
7
Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.用于固定肱骨远端关节外骨折的钢板选择:三种不同植入物的生物力学比较
Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2040-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
8
Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs.尺骨远端骨折:锁定钢板与非锁定钢板固定结构的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Aug;28(8):470-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000021.
9
Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?锁定加压接骨板的生物力学测试:骨与植入物之间的距离何时会显著降低结构稳定性?
Injury. 2007 Mar;38(3):358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
10
Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.在犬桡骨远端间隙模型中,对颅骨应用的3.5毫米锁定加压钢板和内侧应用的2.7毫米锁定加压钢板进行体外生物力学比较。
Vet Surg. 2013 Oct;42(7):840-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12063.x. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of a novel screw system with a variable locking angle in mandible angle fractures.一种新型可变锁定角度螺钉系统在下颌角骨折中的生物力学分析
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023 Nov;61(11):2951-2961. doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02895-y. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures.锁定钢板与动力加压钢板治疗前臂骨干骨折的疗效比较
Orthopedics. 2013 Jul;36(7):e917-22. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-23.
2
The biomechanics of three different fracture fixation implants for distal femur repair in the presence of a tumor-like defect.三种不同的骨折固定植入物在存在肿瘤样缺损情况下用于股骨远端修复的生物力学
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Jan;227(1):78-86. doi: 10.1177/0954411912454368.
3
Optimal mechanical environment of the healing bone fracture/osteotomy.骨折/骨切开术愈合的最佳力学环境。
Int Orthop. 2012 Apr;36(4):689-95. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1487-8. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
4
In vitro models for bone mechanobiology: applications in bone regeneration and tissue engineering.骨力学生物学的体外模型:在骨再生和组织工程中的应用
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010 Dec;224(12):1533-41. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM807.
5
Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.锁定螺钉与非锁定螺钉混合钢板固定对骨质疏松性骨干锁定钢板固定结构强度的影响。
J Trauma. 2010 Aug;69(2):411-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ec9417.
6
Femoral fractures in adolescents: a comparison of four methods of fixation.青少年股骨骨折:四种固定方法的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1122-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01735.
7
Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength.远皮质锁定可降低锁定钢板结构的刚度,同时保持结构强度。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1985-94. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01038.
8
Mechanical comparison of 3.5 mm broad dynamic compression plate, broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and narrow locking compression plate systems using interfragmentary gap models.使用骨折块间间隙模型对3.5毫米宽动力加压钢板、宽有限接触动力加压钢板和窄锁定加压钢板系统进行力学比较。
Vet Surg. 2008 Oct;37(7):663-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00433.x.
9
Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis.骨质疏松性股骨干模型中传统钢板与锁定钢板固定的相对稳定性
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Feb;24(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
Increasing nail-cortical contact to increase fixation stability and decrease implant strain in antegrade locked nailing of distal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.增加股骨远端骨折顺行交锁髓内钉固定时的钉-皮质接触以提高固定稳定性并降低植入物应变:一项生物力学研究
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):436-42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318154013b.

一种用于治疗长骨骨折的新型可调式动力接骨板:一项体外生物力学研究。

A novel adjustable dynamic plate for treatment of long bone fractures: An in vitro biomechanical study.

作者信息

Karakasli Ahmet, Acar Nihat, Karaarslan Ahmet, Ertem Fatih, Havitcioglu Hasan

机构信息

Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 35340 Balcova, Izmir, Turkey.

Gazikent Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 35340 Gazi Emir, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(Suppl 2):177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2016.08.006
PMID:28053382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5197444/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Locking compression plate (LCP) system was designed to provide bone stability and to enhance bone healing. However, implant failure, nonunion and instability are still frequently encountered complications. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the biomechanical characteristics of a novel adjustable dynamic plate (ADP) with the commonly used LCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve 4th generation composite artificial femoral bones were used. Transverse fracture was created in all bones, 6 femurs were fixated using the novel ADP, whereas the other 6 femurs were fixated using the traditional LCP. All samples had undergone a non-destructive repetitive different forces (axial compression, bending and torsion), to evaluate the biomechanical differences between the two plating systems.

RESULTS

Under axial load the mean stiffness value was 439.0 N/mm for the ADP and 158.9 N/mm for the LCP, ADP showed a statistically significant stiffness value than LCP with a value of 0.004. There was no significant difference in flexion/extension bending strain values between ADP and LCP. However LCP provided significantly stiffer fixation in medial and lateral bending tests than ADP ( = 0.037) and ( = 0.016) respectively. But no significant difference was detected between the two plating system in the applied torsional stress.

CONCLUSION

These results do not show any significant biomechanical difference in the applied torsional and bending stresses between LCP and ADP. However the remarkably increased persistent compression effect of the ADP created a considerable stress on fracture edges which may accelerate bone healing.

摘要

引言

锁定加压接骨板(LCP)系统旨在提供骨骼稳定性并促进骨愈合。然而,植入物失败、骨不连和不稳定仍是常见的并发症。本研究的目的是评估并比较新型可调动力接骨板(ADP)与常用LCP的生物力学特性。

材料与方法

使用12根第4代复合人工股骨。所有股骨均制造横向骨折,6根股骨用新型ADP固定,另外6根股骨用传统LCP固定。所有样本均承受非破坏性重复不同力(轴向压缩、弯曲和扭转),以评估两种接骨板系统之间的生物力学差异。

结果

在轴向载荷下,ADP的平均刚度值为439.0N/mm,LCP为158.9N/mm,ADP的刚度值比LCP具有统计学显著差异,P值为0.004。ADP和LCP在屈伸弯曲应变值方面无显著差异。然而,在内外侧弯曲试验中,LCP分别比ADP提供了显著更硬的固定(P = 0.037)和(P = 0.016)。但在施加的扭转应力方面,两种接骨板系统之间未检测到显著差异。

结论

这些结果表明,LCP和ADP在施加的扭转和弯曲应力方面没有任何显著的生物力学差异。然而,ADP显著增强的持续压缩效应在骨折边缘产生了相当大的应力,这可能会加速骨愈合。