Kulkarni Preeti, Karanam Ashwin, Gurjar Murari, Dhoble Sagar, Naik Arvind B, Vidhun Bhaskar H, Gota Vikram
Gahlot Institute of Pharmacy, Plot No 59, Sector 14, Koparkhairne, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 410210 India.
Springerplus. 2016 Dec 20;5(1):2102. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3770-4. eCollection 2016.
Pharmacokinetic studies are vital in development and optimization of drugs. While blood samples can be collected either in EDTA, heparin or citrate containing tubes for the estimation of drug levels in plasma, EDTA tubes are more commonly used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of anticoagulants on bioanalysis of drugs. Six drugs used extensively in cancer therapy were selected. Albino wistar rats (N = 6 per drug) were dosed with one of the following drugs intraperitoneally-pemetrexed (50 mg/kg), imatinib (50 mg/kg), erlotinib (25 mg/kg), meropenem (60 mg/kg), 6-mercaptopurine (20 mg/kg) and voriconazole (6 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected 2 h after dosing (1 h in 6-mercaptopurine group due to short half-life) by terminal bleeding from the retro-orbital plexus. Blood was collected in each of Disodium ETDA, heparin, trisodium citrate (TSC) and no anticoagulant (plain) tubes. Drug levels in these samples were determined by validated HPLC assays. ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was performed to identify statistically significant differences in drug concentrations in anticoagulant tubes. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Significant differences in concentration between anticoagulant tubes was observed in case of erlotinib (p = 0.013) and meropenem (p = 0.00), while borderline statistical significance for pemetrexed (p = 0.076). TSC tubes overestimated erlotinib levels, heparin tubes underestimated meropenem concentrations and EDTA tubes overestimated pemetrexed concentrations.
Careful selection of anti-coagulant is necessary for accurate characterization of pharmacokinetics of drugs. Routine use of EDTA tubes may lead to erroneous interpretation of pharmacokinetic data.
药代动力学研究对于药物的研发和优化至关重要。虽然可以在含有乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、肝素或柠檬酸盐的试管中采集血样以测定血浆中的药物水平,但EDTA试管使用更为普遍。本研究的目的是评估抗凝剂对药物生物分析的影响。选择了六种在癌症治疗中广泛使用的药物。白化Wistar大鼠(每种药物n = 6)腹腔注射以下药物之一:培美曲塞(50 mg/kg)、伊马替尼(50 mg/kg)、厄洛替尼(25 mg/kg)、美罗培南(60 mg/kg)、6-巯基嘌呤(20 mg/kg)和伏立康唑(6 mg/kg)。给药后2小时(6-巯基嘌呤组由于半衰期短为1小时)通过眶后丛终末放血采集血样。血样分别采集于EDTA二钠、肝素、柠檬酸三钠(TSC)和无抗凝剂(普通)试管中。通过经过验证的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定这些样品中的药物水平。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验来确定抗凝剂试管中药物浓度的统计学显著差异。p < 0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。
在厄洛替尼(p = 0.013)和美罗培南(p = 0.00)的情况下,观察到抗凝剂试管之间的浓度存在显著差异,而培美曲塞具有临界统计学显著性(p = 0.076)。TSC试管高估了厄洛替尼水平,肝素试管低估了美罗培南浓度,EDTA试管高估了培美曲塞浓度。
为准确表征药物的药代动力学,必须谨慎选择抗凝剂。常规使用EDTA试管可能导致药代动力学数据的错误解读。