Strøyer Simon, Mantoni Teit, Svendsen Lars Bo
The Abdominal Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesiology, The Abdominal Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;115(2):186-191. doi: 10.1002/jso.24483. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
The Surgical Apgar Score is a simple outcome score based on intraoperative parameters. The scoring system is recently validated in patients undergoing esophagectomy but without comparable results. This study evaluated the ability of the original and modified Surgical Apgar Scores to predict major complications in a patient population undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
We retrospectively examined 234 patients who successfully underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen from November 23, 2011 till November 23, 2014. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher within 30 days after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess factors associated with major complications. Receiver operating characteristics were performed for determination of the predictive value of the Surgical Apgar Score scoring systems.
There were 64 (27.4%) patients with at least one major complication and 4 (1.7%) deaths. The original and modified versions of the Surgical Apgar Score were not associated with major complications and the scoring systems showed no significant predictive value when receiver operating characteristics were performed.
The original or modified versions of the Surgical Apgar Score could possibly be useful in some subgroups of esophagectomy patients, but should not be considered to have a general predictive value. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:186-191. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
手术阿氏评分是一种基于术中参数的简单结局评分。该评分系统最近在接受食管切除术的患者中得到验证,但结果缺乏可比性。本研究评估了原始版和改良版手术阿氏评分预测接受艾弗-刘易斯食管切除术患者主要并发症的能力。
我们回顾性研究了2011年11月23日至2014年11月23日在哥本哈根里格霍斯医院成功接受艾弗-刘易斯食管切除术的234例患者。主要并发症定义为术后30天内Clavien-Dindo分级为IIIa级或更高。进行单因素和多因素分析以评估与主要并发症相关的因素。绘制受试者工作特征曲线以确定手术阿氏评分系统的预测价值。
有64例(占27.4%)患者至少发生一种主要并发症,4例(占1.7%)死亡。手术阿氏评分的原始版和改良版与主要并发症无关,在绘制受试者工作特征曲线时,该评分系统未显示出显著的预测价值。
手术阿氏评分的原始版或改良版可能在某些食管切除术患者亚组中有用,但不应被认为具有普遍的预测价值。《外科肿瘤学杂志》2017年;115:186 - 191。©2017威利期刊公司