Wei Li, Ratnayake Lasantha, Phillips Gabby, McGuigan Chris C, Morant Steve V, Flynn Robert W, Mackenzie Isla S, MacDonald Thomas M
Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lowestoft Road, Gorleston-on-Sea. Norfolk, NR31 6LA, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;83(6):1298-1308. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13205. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
To investigate whether acid-suppression medicines (ASMs) increase the risk of bacterial gastroenteritis.
A population-based, propensity-score matched cohort study using a record-linkage database in Tayside, UK. The study consisted of 188 323 exposed to ASMs (proton-pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists) and 376 646 controls (a propensity-score matched cohort from the rest of population who were not exposed to ASMs) between 1999 and 2013. The main outcome measure was a positive stool test for Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella or Escherichia coli O157. The association between ASMs and risk of bacterial gastroenteritis was assessed by a Cox regression model.
There were 22 705 positive test results (15 273 C. difficile [toxin positive], 6590 Campylobacter, 852 Salmonella, 129 Shigella and 193 E. coli O157, not mutually exclusive) with a total of 5 729 743 person-years follow up time in Tayside, 1999-2013. The adjusted hazard ratios for culture positive diarrhoea for the proton-pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists exposed vs. unexposed cohort were 2.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33, 3.17) during follow-up time for samples submitted from the community and 1.28 (95% CI 1.08, 1.52) for samples submitted from hospitals. Compared with the unexposed cohort, patients in the exposed group had increased risks of C. difficile and Campylobacter [adjusted hazard ratios of 1.70 (95% CI 1.28, 2.25), 3.71 (95% CI 3.04, 4.53) for community samples, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.17, 1.71), 4.53 (95% CI 1.75, 11.8) for hospital samples, respectively].
The results suggest that community prescribed ASMs were associated with increased rates of C. difficile and Campylobacter positive gastroenteritis in both the community and hospital settings.
调查抑酸药物(ASMs)是否会增加细菌性肠胃炎的风险。
采用英国泰赛德地区的记录链接数据库进行一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。该研究纳入了1999年至2013年间188323名使用ASMs(质子泵抑制剂和组胺-2受体拮抗剂)的患者以及376646名对照者(从未使用ASMs的其余人群中通过倾向评分匹配得到的队列)。主要观察指标为艰难梭菌、弯曲杆菌、沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌或大肠杆菌O157粪便检测呈阳性。通过Cox回归模型评估ASMs与细菌性肠胃炎风险之间的关联。
在1999年至2013年的泰赛德地区,共有5729743人年的随访时间,出现了22705份阳性检测结果(15273份艰难梭菌[毒素阳性]、6590份弯曲杆菌、852份沙门氏菌、129份志贺氏菌和193份大肠杆菌O157,并非相互排斥)。社区送检样本随访期间,质子泵抑制剂和组胺-2受体拮抗剂暴露组与未暴露组相比,培养阳性腹泻的调整后风险比为2.72(95%置信区间[CI]2.33,3.17);医院送检样本的该风险比为1.28(95%CI1.08,1.52)。与未暴露组相比,暴露组患者艰难梭菌和弯曲杆菌感染风险增加[社区样本的调整后风险比分别为1.70(95%CI1.28,2.25)、3.71(95%CI3.04,4.53),医院样本分别为1.42(95%CI1.17,1.71)、4.53(95%CI1.75,11.8)]。
结果表明,社区开具的ASMs与社区和医院环境中艰难梭菌和弯曲杆菌阳性肠胃炎发病率增加有关。